- Thread starter
- #21
Austin
Well-known member
When did I mention a need for innovation?There's no reason to think you or anyone else would be happier in the hobby with more releases or more vendors; you haven't indicated - even in a general sense, never mind a specific one - more of what you want to see with regard to innovation because you probably don't even know (IDK, glitter?). There's only so much one can do with cards...
I'm a set collector. I like things simple.
I just want a better selection of simple base sets, from different companies, all with licenses and no airbrushed hats.
Large 400 to 800 card base sets by more companies.
Cheap packs of base cards from many companies so collectors can bust affordable boxes and trade to build sets.
Give Upper Deck, Leaf and Panini licenses to use team logos so the cards don't look cheap.
MLB can still limit the amount of sets each company makes so there's not a glut on the market.
All I'm asking for is more variety in the number of companies that can make licensed cards.
Topps should not have a monopoly.