Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Baseball Mount Rushmore - Babe Ruth a lock?

Is Babe Ruth a lock to be on MLB Mount Rushmore?

  • No, Babe Ruth would NOT be on the MLB Mount Rushmore

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    46

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

shanks25

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
3,327
3
The Ruth question in itself is laughable.....

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Freedom Card Board mobile app
 

AmishDave

Featured Contributor, Collector Showcase, Senior M
Sep 19, 2009
12,383
37
Ely, MN
I'd guess you'd have to have a hitters one and a pitchers one. Just my opinion.
 

jcmint

Super Moderator
Aug 7, 2008
5,677
2
Starts and ends with Ruth
two hitters two pitchers
ruth
williams
walter Johnson
cy young
 

hrbek14

New member
Jan 27, 2013
144
0
Waconia, MN
If some feel as tho Ruth should not be an automatic lock on an MLB Rushmore, leads me to believe 1 of 2 things....1. That person is still in pull-up diapers so when asked about ruth, the response would be "who's that?" Or 2. Not enough is known about the Bambino and think there are others far greater. IMO

Agree, definitely can see circumstances where he's not on people's lists. It's kind of the like greatest movie lists and people saying why the f should I care about Citizen Kane?
 

Tzvih123

New member
Feb 21, 2014
219
0
Long Island,NY
My Mount Rushmore would be, based on greatness, historical importance and name recognition:

Babe Ruth
Cy Young
Jackie Robinson
Ted Williams

Ted Williams? Why not Nolan Ryan, Mickey Mantle, or even Derek Jeter. Today more people would recognize the name Derek Jeter than Ted Williams. and I'd put Jackie Robinson before Cy Young.
 

Tzvih123

New member
Feb 21, 2014
219
0
Long Island,NY
My Mount Rushmore would be, based on greatness, historical importance and name recognition:

Babe Ruth
Cy Young
Jackie Robinson
Ted Williams

Derek Jeter is just laughable!! At least in my opinion

I'm just saying Ted Williams doesn't have historical importance or name recognition. I think someone like Hank Aaron, Mickey Mantle, or Nolan Ryan would have more historical importance and name recognition. Particularly Hank Aaron.
 

Krom

New member
Jun 13, 2010
2,840
0
Long Island
I'm just saying Ted Williams doesn't have historical importance or name recognition. I think someone like Hank Aaron, Mickey Mantle, or Nolan Ryan would have more historical importance and name recognition. Particularly Hank Aaron.

Mantle over Williams?
 

Lancemountain

Active member
Apr 11, 2009
8,313
5
Philadelphia
I'm just saying Ted Williams doesn't have historical importance or name recognition.


zu5ydyru.jpg
 

maxe0213

New member
Oct 10, 2012
1,833
0
California and Oregon for school
Ted Williams? Why not Nolan Ryan, Mickey Mantle, or even Derek Jeter. Today more people would recognize the name Derek Jeter than Ted Williams. and I'd put Jackie Robinson before Cy Young.
I think Jackie is definitely on there.
Derek Jeter is just laughable!! At least in my opinion
Just as laughable as Williams IMO. Neither should be there if you are picking 4 players.
 

Musial Collector

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
5,671
2
Just as laughable as Williams IMO. Neither should be there if you are picking 4 players.

Wait.......Williams is laughable, not only laughable BUT just as laughable as Jeter???
And you agree that Williams "doesnt have historical importance OR name recognition"???
This one you need to explain!
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Top