- Thread starter
- #1
bmp1971
Active member
Here's a statistical comparison of Ted Williams, Bryce Harper, and Mike Trout, through their first four seasons in MLB-- all aged 20-24 at the time of these stats:
TED WILLIAMS: 586 G, 2104 AB, 749 H, 541 R, 154 2B, 33 3B, 127 HR, 515 RBI, .356 BA, 1.129 OPS, 11/11 SB/CS
BRYCE HARPER: 510 G, 1830 AB, 528 H, 328 R, 98 2B, 15 3B, 97 HR, 248 RBI, .289 BA, .902 OPS, 37/16 SB/CS
MIKE TROUT: 493 G, 1873 AB, 572 H, 373 R, 111 2B, 28 3B, 99 HR, 307 RBI, .305 BA, .891 OPS, 102/14 SB/CS
Just wanted to see how these young guns compared to perhaps the greatest hitter of all time. I chose the first 4 years since that's all we've got to go on with Harper-- Trout's one year older than Bryce, so I didn't include his stats from this past season (aged 25).
HR PER AB:
WILLIAMS 1/16.57
HARPER: 1/18.87
TROUT: 1/18.92
Draw your own conclusions!
TED WILLIAMS: 586 G, 2104 AB, 749 H, 541 R, 154 2B, 33 3B, 127 HR, 515 RBI, .356 BA, 1.129 OPS, 11/11 SB/CS
BRYCE HARPER: 510 G, 1830 AB, 528 H, 328 R, 98 2B, 15 3B, 97 HR, 248 RBI, .289 BA, .902 OPS, 37/16 SB/CS
MIKE TROUT: 493 G, 1873 AB, 572 H, 373 R, 111 2B, 28 3B, 99 HR, 307 RBI, .305 BA, .891 OPS, 102/14 SB/CS
Just wanted to see how these young guns compared to perhaps the greatest hitter of all time. I chose the first 4 years since that's all we've got to go on with Harper-- Trout's one year older than Bryce, so I didn't include his stats from this past season (aged 25).
HR PER AB:
WILLIAMS 1/16.57
HARPER: 1/18.87
TROUT: 1/18.92
Draw your own conclusions!
Last edited: