Question for super-collectors (Jose Canseco related)

sportscardtheory · Apr 25, 2012

On the back of every 1991 Stadium Club Pre-Production card is a picture of a 1986 Topps Traded Jose Canseco rookie card. The set contains 50 DIFFERENT cards. Would it be outside the realm of reason for a super-collector to obtain the entire set as part of their Jose Canseco collection?

Example:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1991-TOPPS-...US_Baseball&hash=item2c64d74652#ht_500wt_1285

clarkfan · Apr 25, 2012

I know if I collected him, I'd have the full set. Sort of like Topps Tek, annoying to pursue, but rewarding as well. Although, none of those seem to terribly hard to find, so I doubt it would cost the same fortune the Topps Tek craziness does.

henderson939 · Apr 25, 2012

Yes they must be owned. I am working on the Fleer/SI World Series covers that all picture the Henderson cover on the back.

ASTROBURN · Apr 26, 2012

I would count it in my cameo collection, so it's a go for me if I collected Canseco.

gracecollector · Apr 26, 2012

I always wondered if any of the Jeter or Griffey supercollectors bought full sets of 2008 Goudey. Then think of all the parallels/mini!

$(KGrHqN,!ncE9fid-UUDBPfzyZWg0w~~60_1.JPG

Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Question for super-collectors (Jose Canseco related)

What do you think?

It would make complete sense, super-collectors are a different breed

It would be within the realm of reason

It would be complete insanity, super-collectors can be nuts

sportscardtheory

Active member

clarkfan

Active member

henderson939

New member

ASTROBURN

Active member

gracecollector

Well-known member

Similar threads

Members online

Latest posts