- Thread starter
- #1
P_Manning 18
New member
- Aug 7, 2008
- 6,121
- 0
These look pretty cool
Welcome to our community
Be apart of something great, join today!
Topps is tweeting some Tribute Eccentric Eye Black cards
- Thread starter P_Manning 18
- Start date
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Cool idea for cards.
hive17
Active member
- Aug 7, 2008
- 21,426
- 24
Wonder if there will be any Yunel Escobar errors in the set
It'll be the next generation "Billy Ripken FF"
SteelBrad
New member
- Mar 2, 2013
- 820
- 0
Cool idea!
Collecting Sean Burnett & Bobby Bonilla!
Collecting Sean Burnett & Bobby Bonilla!
All In Cards
Super Moderator
these look great, box prices keep on going up also. I think production is pretty low on this release. I could be wrong.
wlalocal71
Active member
been done for football a few times already
petMonster
Member
- Jan 20, 2012
- 549
- 6
Next up...game-chewed gum! Topps comes full circle back to chewing gum. I can't wait!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Sports Cards by Freedom Card Board.com
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Sports Cards by Freedom Card Board.com
Casebusters
Active member
Last edited:
schmidtfan20
Active member
- Aug 24, 2008
- 6,444
- 0
next up filling redemption cards in a timely manner, oh wait, nevermind.
Pine Tar
Active member
Oddly enough, I bet some of those are going to be a redemption too.
jaydub
Member
Topps Company @toppscards 9h
Tribute "Eccentric Eye Black" cards are not player worn, proved not feasible, but cards r beautiful! #WARRIOR #HARPER pic.twitter.com/nQPUbrLO5d
Nick hinds @nrhinds 9h
@toppscards so even though the cards say "player worn" eye black its actually not player worn #falserepresentation
Topps Company @toppscards 9h
@nrhinds we made a mistake, intention was to have player worn, its new technology, it didnt work, we are now making that clear,
oops!
Tribute "Eccentric Eye Black" cards are not player worn, proved not feasible, but cards r beautiful! #WARRIOR #HARPER pic.twitter.com/nQPUbrLO5d
Nick hinds @nrhinds 9h
@toppscards so even though the cards say "player worn" eye black its actually not player worn #falserepresentation
Topps Company @toppscards 9h
@nrhinds we made a mistake, intention was to have player worn, its new technology, it didnt work, we are now making that clear,
oops!
A_Pharis
Active member
Way to plan ahead, Topps! Why would you put the print on the card without even having a test of the concept? Oh, wait. It's Topps.
hive17
Active member
- Aug 7, 2008
- 21,426
- 24
Yeah, clear to the people that follow Topps on Twitter; so, like 10% of the people that will end up with the product.
A_Pharis
Active member
Bingo. They say "Oop, we made a mistake," but a ton of them will move on the secondary market under the assumption they are player-used. At the point they realized it wouldn't work - those cards should have been destroyed... I mean - of all the rants about false advertising - this is your best shot at taking it to Topps.
I wonder what "new technology" they have that failed. Could they not have gone with old technology, e.g. glue, to get them to stick on? They're 1/1s, so it's not as huge a deal as it might have been, but surely they'll go for 100x what they should. Although, who wrote on them, the players?
rico08
Active member
In good news, Topps' exclusive is up in just 7 years!
