Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Kris Bryant & Maikel Franco File Grievenaces Regarding Service Time Manipulation

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Jaypers

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
48,950
1,455
IL
More power to them. Hope they win.


http://sports.yahoo.com/news/source...nipulation-of-service-time-213422124-mlb.html


Sources: Kris Bryant, Maikel Franco filed grievances over manipulation of service time

Jeff Passan By Jeff Passan
26 minutes ago
Yahoo Sports

Chicago Cubs third baseman Kris Bryant and Philadelphia Phillies third baseman Maikel Franco have filed grievances against their teams alleging they were kept in the minor leagues unnecessarily and had their service time manipulated to delay future free agency, multiple major league sources told Yahoo Sports.

Potential service-time manipulation looms as a significant issue with Major League Baseball and the MLB Players Association ramping up discussions on a new collective-bargaining agreement after the current one expires Dec. 1, 2016. While neither case has yet to reach an arbitration panel, according to sources, the grievances indicate that players believe teams have not abided by the intention of service-time rules and operated in bad faith.

Bryant, the National League Rookie of the Year last season, debuted April 17 and finished the season with 171 days of service time. A full year of service comprises 172 days. The Cubs sent Bryant to Triple-A to start the season, and by calling him up when they did, they positioned themselves to stave off his free agency until 2021. Had Bryant played in their previous game and stayed on the major league roster for next five seasons, he would hit free agency following the 2020 season.

Franco debuted in September 2014 and started the 2015 season at Triple-A. On May 12, the Phillies optioned their everyday third baseman, Cody Asche, to the minor leagues but didn’t recall Franco. He arrived May 15 and finished the season with 170 days of service.

The cases of Bryant and Franco, both 23, highlight the blurry line between teams operating within collectively bargained rules and using trumped-up rationale to retain players for an extra season beyond the six full years that precede free agency. The question of service-time manipulation long predates Bryant and Franco and is an inherent product of a system that bases free agency – as well as the extra year of arbitration known as Super 2 status – on days in the major leagues.

After Bryant led the major leagues with nine home runs in spring training, the Cubs sent him to Triple-A, arguing he needed to work on his fielding. The MLBPA sent out a press release that began: “Today is a bad day for baseball.” When Cubs opening day third baseman Mike Olt hit the disabled list with a right wrist fracture, Bryant came up to take his spot. Bryant played in 151 of the Cubs’ final 154 games, hit .275/.369/.488 with 26 home runs and helped lead Chicago to its first playoff appearance since 2008.

He filed his grievance in April, according to sources, while Franco – who spent most of the season batting third for the Phillies and finished with a .280/.343/.497 line and 14 home runs in 304 at-bats – submitted his later.

Either grievance ever reaching an arbitration panel is in question. Bargaining often includes discussions of open grievances and can include resolutions. Service time is a divisive enough issue that multiple sources on both sides continue to struggle with how to fix a system that the parties agree has been successful by and large but can penalize the best players.

“Sports is a business, and both sides are going to make the decisions they think suit their business aspirations and what they’re trying to accomplish,” said Ryan Royster, Franco’s agent. “We want to see things geared toward winning, and this isn’t just the Phillies. It’s all teams. The fans deserve to see the best product on the field, and the players deserve the best team surrounding them so they can win.”

Neither Cubs president Theo Epstein, Phillies nor Bryant’s agent, Scott Boras, replied to requests for comment from Yahoo Sports. Phillies general manager Matt Klentak declined to comment.

The ultimate question for arbitrator Fredric Horowitz would concern whether teams acted in good faith, a thorny threshold that could prove difficult to demonstrate. The Bryant and Franco cases certainly aren’t outliers. Multiple other players considered filing grievances, sources told Yahoo Sports, including Houston Astros outfielder George Springer and Pittsburgh Pirates outfielder Gregory Polanco.

Springer and Polanco both were offered long-term contracts before their major league debuts. After Springer rejected a reported seven-year deal in September 2013, the Astros sent Springer to the minor leagues to start the 2014 season before calling him up April 16. He finished last year with one year, 166 days of service. Polanco didn’t arrive in Pittsburgh until June – more than a month after he turned down a seven-year deal.

Neither pursued a grievance, leaving Bryant and Franco as the test cases. Whether they ever reach the point of resolution – or how they could be resolved while placating the sides of both player and team – remains an open question and one with significant implications. If Bryant or Franco continues on a star track, an extra year in their prime would be worth tens of millions of dollars.
 

hive17

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
21,426
24
With Olt's injury preceding Bryant's call-up, it'll be hard to argue that the Cubs picked a day out of hat that happened to work against Bryant, which would suggest bad-faith to me.

Franco too has a bit of a hard time making a case that the Phillies "used" him, since they weren't interested in winning, and could have just kept him down longer.

Still I think it's a legitimate issue and I do believe teams ARE trying to get the better of the CBA.
 

PeteD

Active member
Oct 15, 2009
2,175
17
Southern Ont.
What's Bryant b*itching about? If he started opening day he most likely have smashed the season strikeout record (he finished with 199).
 

Jaypers

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
48,950
1,455
IL
What's Bryant b*itching about? If he started opening day he most likely have smashed the season strikeout record (he finished with 199).

And collected 100+ RBI.

Sent from my XT907 using Freedom Card Board mobile app
 

PeteD

Active member
Oct 15, 2009
2,175
17
Southern Ont.
And collected 100+ RBI.

Sent from my XT907 using Freedom Card Board mobile app

hahaha alway's the optimist JP...but i have no doubt he'll cut down that number to let's say 1 a game, which is acceptable these days for a slugger.

now there's an 3b that lead the NL in K's 3 of his 4 full seasons...including a whopping 180 back in the '70's. ended up in the HOF and has an WS ring.
 

fordman

Well-known member
Feb 22, 2013
3,190
32
Ohio
The Reds did the same thing to Todd Frazier a couple years ago. Being a Union man and knowing how CBA's and arbitrations work, it's all about what's written and agreed to. If the contract says 172 days, then 172 days it is. Next question is do they count off days as a day or just game days? Do double headers count as two days? Does time count if you're on the 40-man roster?

I think this will AGGRESIVELY be pushed for in the next CBA. I'm thinking that the MLBPA will take a make or break kind of stance on it.

Only issue with this is, the relationship the player has had with the team. (Not Bryant specific here) Did the team groom him all the way through the minors or was a traded player that was brought up from one organization, traded to another, then excelled into the majors? It's hard for any Union to negotiate on the behalf of future employees and those within their probationary period.

What the Cubs should have done to help their case was send him back down for a couple more weeks during the season.

Fordman
 
Last edited:

smapdi

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
4,397
221
Any rules for anything are bound to be manipulated, from sports to the Constitution. Baseball has a long history filled with loopholes and hair-splitting. It even has rules in place to prevent players from gaining an advantage from following the rules (in-field fly, foul-tip strike, K on third-strike bunt, no more than 1 runner on a base, etc.). In some cases, like Franco's, it looks like it just happened to work out that way. In Bryant's case, it might have been day-counting on the Cubs's part, maybe not, but boo-hoo, he has to wait a whole extra year to make an extra bajillion dollars. Or, less emotionally, if he doesn't want to abide by the rules of the organization he's in, he is free to quit and get a real job. Go to an independent league or something. I don't recall any grievances being filed against that player who broke his hand in his 130th at-bat that one year and then won ROY the next.
 

George_Calfas

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2008
36,264
30
Urbana
Tough ****. Life's not fair sometimes, get over yourselves.
The teams did absolutely nothing wrong within the rules that were collectively bargained.
Langauge in the CBA prohibits teams from service clock manipulation. With Bryant's Spring Training numbers coupled with his success in the regular season it will be argued that the Cubs delayed his entry to the major league club base upon control. If I were to bet beer money on this I would side with the players.
 
You can argue that, but how do you prove it (short of a document surfacing that proves it)? And, here's the million (or billion) dollar question, who get's to tell a major league team, player x is ready to play in the majors, you have to bring him up? One concept from public policy study is the idea of unintended consequences, believe me this would open a whole can of worms. If the owners give anything in the next CBA on this point, you can bet the players will have to give something up. So, from a negotiating prospective do you fight for something that affects at most a handful of players each year versus a concession that may affect hundreds of players a year?
 

Hawk8

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2013
8,401
269
Louisiana
The rules are the rules and the Cubs did not do anything against the rules. If the players are not happy with the rules then they need to work on that the next time the contract is up.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top