- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
js0000001 said:
Tomlinson21RB said:Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.
1pm eastern.Russ S. said:and these go on sale again at what time? 11 eastern right?
cgilmo said:Tomlinson21RB said:Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.
no need to second guess it
It is as good as done.
THanks. Have an hour 25 to kill...200lbhockeyplayer said:1pm eastern.Russ S. said:and these go on sale again at what time? 11 eastern right?
Tomlinson21RB said:cgilmo said:Tomlinson21RB said:Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.
no need to second guess it
It is as good as done.
Is Razor getting paid or is it allowed in the contract?
cgilmo said:Tomlinson21RB said:cgilmo said:Tomlinson21RB said:Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.
no need to second guess it
It is as good as done.
Is Razor getting paid or is it allowed in the contract?
they have no say in the matter
Wieters is subject to MLBPA licensing
etopps is licensed by the MLBPA as opposed to all their other stuff where they have to get individual contracts.
cgilmo said:Tomlinson21RB said:cgilmo said:Tomlinson21RB said:Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.
no need to second guess it
It is as good as done.
Is Razor getting paid or is it allowed in the contract?
they have no say in the matter
Wieters is subject to MLBPA licensing
etopps is licensed by the MLBPA as opposed to all their other stuff where they have to get individual contracts.
cgilmo said:Tomlinson21RB said:cgilmo said:Tomlinson21RB said:Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.
no need to second guess it
It is as good as done.
Is Razor getting paid or is it allowed in the contract?
they have no say in the matter
Wieters is subject to MLBPA licensing
etopps is licensed by the MLBPA as opposed to all their other stuff where they have to get individual contracts.
Tomlinson21RB said:cgilmo said:Tomlinson21RB said:cgilmo said:Tomlinson21RB said:Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.
no need to second guess it
It is as good as done.
Is Razor getting paid or is it allowed in the contract?
they have no say in the matter
Wieters is subject to MLBPA licensing
etopps is licensed by the MLBPA as opposed to all their other stuff where they have to get individual contracts.
Oh, that makes sense. I didn't realize eTopps had different rules than Topps when it came to licensing. If Razor does anything next year they should say "exclusive*" instead of "exclusive."