Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

This weeks eTopps 6/1

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

js0000001

New member
Oct 1, 2008
4,598
0
Wieters, F- Martinez & Lincecum This Week


025-01556fd.jpg


025-01557fd.jpg


025-01558fd.jpg
 

Tomlinson21RB

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
7,459
1
MA
Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.
 

Tomlinson21RB

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
7,459
1
MA
cgilmo said:
Tomlinson21RB said:
Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.

no need to second guess it


It is as good as done.

Is Razor getting paid or is it allowed in the contract?
 

cgilmo

Well-known member
Administrator
Aug 6, 2008
37,213
35
Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
Tomlinson21RB said:
cgilmo said:
Tomlinson21RB said:
Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.

no need to second guess it


It is as good as done.

Is Razor getting paid or is it allowed in the contract?

they have no say in the matter

Wieters is subject to MLBPA licensing

etopps is licensed by the MLBPA as opposed to all their other stuff where they have to get individual contracts.
 

Tomlinson21RB

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
7,459
1
MA
cgilmo said:
Tomlinson21RB said:
cgilmo said:
Tomlinson21RB said:
Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.

no need to second guess it


It is as good as done.

Is Razor getting paid or is it allowed in the contract?

they have no say in the matter

Wieters is subject to MLBPA licensing

etopps is licensed by the MLBPA as opposed to all their other stuff where they have to get individual contracts.

Oh, that makes sense. I didn't realize eTopps had different rules than Topps when it came to licensing. If Razor does anything next year they should say "exclusive*" instead of "exclusive."
 

Jaypers

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
48,939
1,441
IL
cgilmo said:
Tomlinson21RB said:
cgilmo said:
Tomlinson21RB said:
Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.

no need to second guess it


It is as good as done.

Is Razor getting paid or is it allowed in the contract?

they have no say in the matter

Wieters is subject to MLBPA licensing

etopps is licensed by the MLBPA as opposed to all their other stuff where they have to get individual contracts.

This might actually give DEEE a run for its' money.

Suffice it to say it'll top his Razor Signature Series base autos/499.
 

Russ S.

New member
Aug 10, 2008
13,379
0
VA / DC / MD
cgilmo said:
Tomlinson21RB said:
cgilmo said:
Tomlinson21RB said:
Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.

no need to second guess it


It is as good as done.

Is Razor getting paid or is it allowed in the contract?

they have no say in the matter

Wieters is subject to MLBPA licensing

etopps is licensed by the MLBPA as opposed to all their other stuff where they have to get individual contracts.

Wooo Hoooo.
Screw You Razor!
 

cgilmo

Well-known member
Administrator
Aug 6, 2008
37,213
35
Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
Tomlinson21RB said:
cgilmo said:
Tomlinson21RB said:
cgilmo said:
Tomlinson21RB said:
Did they remove the image or was there never an image for it? Maybe they're second guessing their ability to print one if they removed the image.

no need to second guess it


It is as good as done.

Is Razor getting paid or is it allowed in the contract?

they have no say in the matter

Wieters is subject to MLBPA licensing

etopps is licensed by the MLBPA as opposed to all their other stuff where they have to get individual contracts.

Oh, that makes sense. I didn't realize eTopps had different rules than Topps when it came to licensing. If Razor does anything next year they should say "exclusive*" instead of "exclusive."

It was quite apparent that there would be exceptions, even from the start of all this mess. If they do sign players in the future, I would think they would try to get a clause in the contracts that has the player opt out of the collective bargaining agreement.


And Russ, was that really nessessary?


Razor has done nothing but try and promote competition. Competition is ESSENTIAL in any industry if the consumers are to get a better product. Where there is no competition, products will suffer.
 

Members online

Top