Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

2009 Bowman Chrome - Poll

Please rank 1-8


  • Total voters
    43

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

masonphillip

New member
Administrator
Aug 7, 2008
8,322
0
Including the last 7 Bowman Chrome products released, where does 2009 Bowman Chrome rank for you in total? Please pick your ranking, 1-8. 1 = best, 8 = worst. If you feel the need, include a little summary of why you ranked it where you did.

As a brief reminder...

2007 Bowman w/Chrome - Jennings, on card paper autos, Venable, Blanks etc.
2007 Bowman Chrome - Lincecum Auto, Joba Auto, Hanson Base
2007 Bowman Chrome Draft - Heyward Base, Price Base, Burgess Auto
2008 Bowman w/Chrome - Heyward Auto, Bumgarner Auto etc
2008 Bowman Chrome - Santana Base, Beltre Auto, Lars Auto, Jackson Auto, Brackman Auto
2008 Bowman Chrome Draft - AFLAC Autos, Posey Auto, Beckham Auto, Stanton Auto, Porcello Base
2009 Bowman w/Chrome - Morrison Auto, Moore Base
 

All The Hype

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
10,250
0
Indianapolis
I ranked it at #6, although that can change in time as the base guys develop and get closer to the big leagues (like all Bowman products).
 

masonphillip

New member
Administrator
Aug 7, 2008
8,322
0
18 votes cast so far, so far weighted average is 5.4.

But really, who voted for #1 or #2?
 

masonphillip

New member
Administrator
Aug 7, 2008
8,322
0
matfanofold said:
masonphillip said:
18 votes cast so far, so far weighted average is 5.4.

But really, who voted for #1 or #2?


Wait, does 8 = best or 1???

1 = best, 8 = worst. I allowed for changing of your vote when creating the poll, so if you need, you can do so.

I ranked #7, the only product I like worse is the one without chrome autos, 2007 bowman w/chrome.
 

masonphillip

New member
Administrator
Aug 7, 2008
8,322
0
27 votes now, 5.4 average.

I'm still curious to see who voted this product the best and why.
 

masonphillip

New member
Administrator
Aug 7, 2008
8,322
0
All In Cards said:
masonphillip said:
27 votes now, 5.4 average.

I'm still curious to see who voted this product the best and why.

I did, why ask why, bud dry.

Any reason for voting that way or you just trying to be a punk?
 

All In Cards

Super Moderator
Aug 7, 2008
23,259
179
21208
masonphillip said:
All In Cards said:
masonphillip said:
27 votes now, 5.4 average.

I'm still curious to see who voted this product the best and why.

I did, why ask why, bud dry.

Any reason for voting that way or you just trying to be a punk?

BC any year to me is good, its good for player collectors, prospectors, set builders and team collectors. Its not always about prospecting.
 

cgilmo

Well-known member
Administrator
Aug 6, 2008
37,213
35
Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
All In Cards said:
masonphillip said:
[quote="All In Cards":1aalgnab]
masonphillip said:
27 votes now, 5.4 average.

I'm still curious to see who voted this product the best and why.

I did, why ask why, bud dry.

Any reason for voting that way or you just trying to be a punk?

BC any year to me is good, its good for player collectors, prospectors, set builders and team collectors. Its not always about prospecting.[/quote:1aalgnab]


you sir, misunderstood the poll question
 

masonphillip

New member
Administrator
Aug 7, 2008
8,322
0
All In Cards said:
masonphillip said:
[quote="All In Cards":3jdd40ao]
masonphillip said:
27 votes now, 5.4 average.

I'm still curious to see who voted this product the best and why.

I did, why ask why, bud dry.

Any reason for voting that way or you just trying to be a punk?

BC any year to me is good, its good for player collectors, prospectors, set builders and team collectors. Its not always about prospecting.[/quote:3jdd40ao]

I see your point but the non-prospector folks buy singles. Player-collectors, set builders and team-collectors. The value in these cases undoubtedly comes from the prospect cards. The fluctuation in value also comes from prospect cards as the veteran set remains rather constant. Thus, you must compare it to other years to determine value.
 

braden

New member
Aug 7, 2008
2,536
0
I voted #1. As of the last checklist I've seen, this year has Moises Sierra and Tim Collins who are two of my favourite Jays prospects in recent memory. In Collins's case, he's my favourite prospect ever. It also has a Brad Emaus autograph which I've been looking forward to for some time.

So, yes, in my opinion, this is the strongest BC checklist in a good while. I liked 2006 Draft as it had Travis Snider and Casey Janssen but this is a bit better for me.
 

jcmint

Super Moderator
Aug 7, 2008
5,677
2
phil w/o reading the rest of the threas your checklists stink lol
masonphillip said:
Including the last 7 Bowman Chrome products released, where does 2009 Bowman Chrome rank for you in total? Please pick your ranking, 1-8. 1 = best, 8 = worst. If you feel the need, include a little summary of why you ranked it where you did.

As a brief reminder...

2007 Bowman w/Chrome - Jennings, on card paper autos, Venable, Blanks etc.
2007 Bowman Chrome - Lincecum Auto, Joba Auto, Hanson Base
2007 Bowman Chrome Draft - Heyward Base, Price Base, Burgess Auto
2008 Bowman w/Chrome - Heyward Auto, Bumgarner Auto etc
2008 Bowman Chrome - Santana Base, Beltre Auto, Lars Auto, Jackson Auto, Brackman Auto
2008 Bowman Chrome Draft - AFLAC Autos, Posey Auto, Beckham Auto, Stanton Auto, Porcello Base
2009 Bowman w/Chrome - Morrison Auto, Moore Base
 
Top