Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Mike Mussina's thoughts on retirement

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

All The Hype

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
10,250
0
Indianapolis
Got an email about this and I'm not sure what site it's from, but I thought it was kinda interesting to read-

When baseball great Mike "Moose" Mussina was an economics major at Stanford, "he wrote a thesis on the wisdom of signing a professional baseball contract out of college rather than high school," reports Allen Barra in the Wall Street Journal (11/25/08). When Mike was in high school, he was "very nearly class valedictorian; rumors in his hometown ... are that he was just too shy to deliver his commencement speech." When Mike announced he was retiring from baseball, "after 18 years and just two average seasons shy of the magic totals of 300 wins and 3,000 strikeouts," most people were surprised.

Mike offered an amazingly refreshing explanation: "People said to me, 'Make sure you do it for yourself.' But the truth is, every decision you make, there's other factors involved. I have young children ... I'm not getting any younger, they're not getting any younger, and you can't get that time back. It's just the right time for me." Just as remarkably, Mike knew all along that this would be his last season, but kept that to himself. "It was like the last year of high school," he said. "You know it's going to end, and you just enjoy the ride."

Incredibly, fans are now debating whether Mike Mussina deserves to be in the Hall of Fame. Detractors focus on what he didn't accomplish -- never won a Cy Young award or a World Series ring, had a losing record in the post-season, and never led in earned run average. Supporters cite his won-loss record of .638, that he won "19 games twice, 18 games three times, at least 15 games in 11 seasons," and 20 games in his final season -- the first to do so since Sandy Koufax in 1966. Sandy's "hall-worthy" record actually is uncannily similar to Mike's in many respects, including arguably the most important stat -- "they both knew enough to quit when they were on top."
 

BunchOBull

Active member
Dec 12, 2008
5,463
14
Houston, TX
It will be interesting when he becomes hall eligible.

Typically, if you can hang around long enough for 300 wins, win a trophy case full of Cy Youngs, those major accomplishments...you're a shoe in. Obviously Mussina close...but this isn't horseshoes, nor handgranades.

He has some great numbers in his favor though...

1st...consistency... as the article says, he's won 15 games or more 11 times, 17 games twice, 18 games 3 times, 19 games twice, & 20 games in his final season

2nd...a strong win percentage

3rd...his major opponents are scarred by the steroid rumors (in some cases facts)...in the coming 5 to 10 years, how strong will the pool of contenders be? Granted...they could be VERY strong in 5.

4th...(and in my opinion, most important)... he has an ERA+ of 123...that's pretty, if not really, good as compared to the typical HOF pitcher...if I remember correctly his WHIP is pretty strong too.
 

fengzhang

New member
Aug 10, 2008
1,803
0
Chicago, IL
BunchOBull said:
It will be interesting when he becomes hall eligible.

Typically, if you can hang around long enough for 300 wins, win a trophy case full of Cy Youngs, those major accomplishments...you're a shoe in. Obviously Mussina close...but this isn't horseshoes, nor handgranades.

He has some great numbers in his favor though...

1st...consistency... as the article says, he's won 15 games or more 11 times, 17 games twice, 18 games 3 times, 19 games twice, & 20 games in his final season

2nd...a strong win percentage

3rd...his major opponents are scarred by the steroid rumors (in some cases facts)...in the coming 5 to 10 years, how strong will the pool of contenders be? Granted...they could be VERY strong in 5.

4th...(and in my opinion, most important)... he has an ERA+ of 123...that's pretty, if not really, good as compared to the typical HOF pitcher...if I remember correctly his WHIP is pretty strong too.

1. Consistency perhaps, but not dominance. He started off with 2 straight sub 3.00 ERA seasons and had 0 sub 3.00 ERA seasons in the 16 years since then. 0 Cy Youngs. Finished in the top 3 in Cy Young voting just once in 18 years. Only 5 All-Star selections in 18 years. Never had a 20-win season before last year.

2. Played on some strong teams. Nolan Ryan argument.

3. His ERA is very very high for a HOFer. In fact, I believe there's only 1 HOF pitcher who has a higher career ERA.
 

BunchOBull

Active member
Dec 12, 2008
5,463
14
Houston, TX
fengzhang said:
1. Consistency perhaps, but not dominance. He started off with 2 straight sub 3.00 ERA seasons and had 0 sub 3.00 ERA seasons in the 16 years since then. 0 Cy Youngs. Finished in the top 3 in Cy Young voting just once in 18 years. Only 5 All-Star selections in 18 years. Never had a 20-win season before last year.

2. Played on some strong teams. Nolan Ryan argument.

3. His ERA is very very high for a HOFer. In fact, I believe there's only 1 HOF pitcher who has a higher career ERA.

I don't disagree with you at all. I do believe ERA+ is a better judgement of performance though. His ERA being elevated is a product of the fact that he wasn't a strikeout count pitcher. While strikeouts are safest (zero chance at an earned run, error, so on), control pitches that send balls straight up and straight down work too. His lack of strikeouts probably led to his null Cy Young count too.

That being said, do I think he's a HOF'er? I don't know. I wouldn't want to see him in until people like Bert Blyleven are in. Would I be disgusted if he got in? No. Would I be heart broken if he didn't get in? No.
 

archiebunkerjr

New member
Dec 11, 2008
1,749
0
I see a lot of valid points on here. I think he is HOF worthy and I freaking hate the Yankees. Mussina put in a lot of time during the steroid era - of course his numbers are going to be higher. I don't know if I would label him as dominant but I think he was close to that for most of his career. He took the ball every fifth day and pitched his ass off whether he had his stuff that day or not.

I had not seen anything about him retiring to spend time with family. Good for him. I had thought his retirement was a negotitation ploy. I thought he wanted to strictly pitch for the Yankees but in order to get a higher contract, he would threaten a retirement. It sounds like I am wrong.
 

Topnotchsy

Featured Contributor, The best players in history?
Aug 7, 2008
9,449
178
ALL_THE_HYPE said:
Got an email about this and I'm not sure what site it's from, but I thought it was kinda interesting to read-

Sandy's "hall-worthy" record actually is uncannily similar to Mike's in many respects, including arguably the most important stat -- "they both knew enough to quit when they were on top."
This statement makes no sense to me. These guys were about as different as any two pitchers. Moose was consistently once of the better/best pitchers for years and years, while Koufax was had five incredible seasons when there was no one better, and little else.
 

markakis8

Active member
Oct 31, 2008
12,081
2
5 All-Star appearances for a pitcher is very very good. Back in the day it would not have been but today from the 80's on, 5 AS is very good. Pitchers don't get voted in remember, they have to be picked.

This is why position players often have way more AS appearnces than pitchers.

And the direction the HOF is heading with players like Bruce Sutter, Tony Perez, and Goose Gossage getting in, Mike Mussina would get my vote in 5 years.
 

dano7

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
13,387
3,968
Roanoke, VA
To put his family and his time with them first makes him a HOF person, irregardless of the baseball HOF credentials.
DANNY
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top