- Thread starter
- #1
gracecollector
Well-known member
I think I need to know how you are defining it before I say I agree/disagree.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
ThoseBackPages said:
gracecollector said:ThoseBackPages said:
So are you saying a BGS 9.5 with no subs below 9.5? Then I vote for fabricated bunch of doo-doo.
A true gem is a BGS 10. Why should anything less be a true gem when there is something higher? A 9.5 is just a Gem. A 10 is a True Gem, and a 10 with all 10 subs is a Perfect Gem.
It's all baloney anyway.
Frow said:It does seem silly that people put so much stock into the main grade of 9.5 or 9, but then couldn't give a crap about the subs
cgilmo said:Frow said:It does seem silly that people put so much stock into the main grade of 9.5 or 9, but then couldn't give a crap about the subs
the subs are what makes the main grade.
If you give a crap about the main grade, you give a crap about the subs. However most of us arent anal enough to require a 9.5 all the way around. I don't like off center cards, so i perfer a 9.5 centering grade.
daveyou said:as long as it's a gold label, that is all i care about!
plus, i've noticed that although i do not buy many slabbed cards, i would treat a 9.5, 9.5, 9.5, 9 as the same as 10, 10, 9.5, 9.5 (this is 9.5, right?) in terms of my spending
dave
jcmint said:A gem is a gem in my book. I too agree on centering but I have seen 9 centered cards that look 50/50 and on the other hand I have seen them at 70/30 too. I am all about the gold label. Sales wise I have never received more for 4 9.5's then 3 9.5's. I do not think it makes that much of a difference. To each his own.
flightposite said:Aren't options 2 and 3 basically the same thing?