- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Topnotchsy said:If I had to guess, he signs back in St. Louis. Something like 6 years, $150 million. No debate he's the best hitter in baseball, and a gold glover, but I think he gives a hometown discount.
ThoseBackPages said:Jeter>Pujols>Teixeria
6 years $150 million is $25 million a year, so per year, it's no shabby. Guess it could be 7 years, $175 million or so.thenumberonemetfan said:Topnotchsy said:If I had to guess, he signs back in St. Louis. Something like 6 years, $150 million. No debate he's the best hitter in baseball, and a gold glover, but I think he gives a hometown discount.
Not a 70 million dollar discount.
Topnotchsy said:6 years $150 million is $25 million a year, so per year, it's no shabby. Guess it could be 7 years, $175 million or so.thenumberonemetfan said:Topnotchsy said:If I had to guess, he signs back in St. Louis. Something like 6 years, $150 million. No debate he's the best hitter in baseball, and a gold glover, but I think he gives a hometown discount.
Not a 70 million dollar discount.
Topnotchsy said:If I had to guess, he signs back in St. Louis. Something like 6 years, $150 million. No debate he's the best hitter in baseball, and a gold glover, but I think he gives a hometown discount.
The signing of Pujols quelled the controversy surrounding the negotiations involving fan uproar upon hearing that Pujols declared there would be “no hometown discount.” Fans in St. Louis had enjoyed a recent tradition of players such as Mark McGwire, Jim Edmonds, Jason Isringhausen and Scott Rolen, who all signed deals believed to be underneath their market values. However, now that the signing is in the books, Cardinal fans must ask themselves this question: Where was this signing in relation to Pujols’ market value? Well, that is an extremely difficult question to answer considering that a deal of this nature is unprecedented for a player that is merely 24 years old. No player has ever started a career with a consistent 3-year standard of excellence (.300+, 30+ HR, 100+ RBI, 100+ Runs) like Albert Pujols, and no player has hit more homers in their first three seasons (114). If you favor the rhetoric that players this young “are only going to improve,” you may find that this signing was excellent for the Cardinals, because another year like Pujols’ 2003 line (MLB-best .359 avg., 43 HR, 127 RBI, 137 R) could have priced Pujols out of St. Louis entirely. Whether you consider St. Louis a small market or not (the payroll is expected to exceed $80 mil), it’s quite rare that smaller cities are able to retain their budding superstars. The agreement with Pujols was, arguably, under market value if you consider that a Hall-of-Fame career could be in the making.