Upper Deck just doesn't learn...

Bob Loblaw · Mar 11, 2010

ChasHawk · Mar 11, 2010

don't get it.

js0000001 · Mar 11, 2010

Team Logos?

NECpilgrims8 · Mar 11, 2010

At this point, who cares anymore about the lawsuit & settlement. They will cease to exist very soon in the MLB market, how about we take it for what it is.

Those displays are SUPER-sweet!

I don't even collect autographed OML balls, but that is something I would buy.

Bob Loblaw · Mar 11, 2010

I was wrong. I thought the clause below included any MLB product. I guess this is allowed.

Upper Deck must receive approval from MLB for the use of baseball jerseys, pants, jackets, caps, helmets or catcher’s equipment in future products featuring players.

jbhofmann · Mar 11, 2010

My guess is that the pictures do not come with the case. But only a guess.

ChasHawk · Mar 11, 2010

jbhofmann said:
My guess is that the pictures do not come with the case. But only a guess.

Correct sir.

http://store.upperdeck.com/store/Ba..._Case__Horizontal_8x10_Version____75939?Args=

cgilmo · Mar 11, 2010

ummm, the lawsuit has nothing to do with those products.

The lawsuit was about a certian category of licencing. Trading Cards.

Seiya · Mar 11, 2010

That case looks pretty awesome.

ChasHawk · Mar 11, 2010

Seiya said:
That case looks pretty awesome.

It should for $99.99

:lol:

Bob Loblaw · Mar 11, 2010

cgilmo said:
ummm, the lawsuit has nothing to do with those products.

The lawsuit was about a certian category of licencing. Trading Cards.

Yeah. I already said I was wrong.

UMich92 · Mar 11, 2010

Looks nice, but for $99 it better be UV protected and I see no mention of that on the website.

Alex

brouthercard · Mar 11, 2010

Is the second guy Raul Mondesi? :lol: :lol:

200lbhockeyplayer · Mar 11, 2010

UMich92 said:
Looks nice, but for $99 it better be UV protected and I see no mention of that on the website.

Alex

The UV version will be $499.

andyduke86 · Mar 11, 2010

The pictures appear to be photofiles, which anyone call sell on the secondary market.

UMich92 · Mar 11, 2010

200lbhockeyplayer said:
UMich92 said:

Looks nice, but for $99 it better be UV protected and I see no mention of that on the website.

Alex

Click to expand...

The UV version will be $499.

Thanks for the laugh.

subpop77 · Mar 11, 2010

200lbhockeyplayer said:
UMich92 said:

Looks nice, but for $99 it better be UV protected and I see no mention of that on the website.
Alex

Click to expand...

The UV version will be $499.

:lol: :benson: ::facepalm::

cgilmo · Mar 11, 2010

Jeff N. said:
cgilmo said:

ummm, the lawsuit has nothing to do with those products.

The lawsuit was about a certian category of licencing. Trading Cards.

Click to expand...

Yeah. I already said I was wrong.

yeah, i skimmed

AKT74 · Mar 11, 2010

cgilmo said:
Jeff N. said:

cgilmo said:

ummm, the lawsuit has nothing to do with those products.

The lawsuit was about a certian category of licencing. Trading Cards.

Click to expand...

Yeah. I already said I was wrong.

Click to expand...

yeah, i skimmed

WHAT?? I thought you proofread every post on here.

Sean_C · Mar 11, 2010

The verticle one is nicer IMHO, but it doesn't mention if it's UV safe, and I'd rather spend $100 on cards or autographs than on displays.

Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Upper Deck just doesn't learn...

Active member

New member

New member

New member

Active member

Active member

New member

Well-known member

Active member

New member

Active member

Well-known member

New member

Active member

New member

Well-known member

New member

Well-known member

New member

New member

Similar threads

Log in