Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Suspicious Auction?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

vwnut13

vwnut13

Active member
Apr 19, 2009
8,004
0
Vermont
Does this auction seem fishy to anybody else?

[ebay:2cs4t23n]250698659539[/ebay:2cs4t23n]

Here is the Auction Scan....

!B3HRRC!BGk~$(KGrHqMOKi0E)UMo!rgjBMl!3izU-w~~_35.jpg

Here is a scan of 69/93....

69front.jpg

As you can tell, the auto placement is not the same.

Hopefully the seller puts up scans of the actual card for sale.
 
RiceLynnEvans75

RiceLynnEvans75

Active member
Feb 9, 2010
3,264
3
NOVA
The guy signed 99 of those cards. Kind of unrealistic to think they would have the auto in the same exact spot/position on each one.
 
E

EricChavezCollector3

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
1,007
8
RiceLynnEvans75 said:
The guy signed 99 of those cards. Kind of unrealistic to think they would have the auto in the same exact spot/position on each one.
Click to expand...

What the OP is saying (correct me if I am wrong) is that the card shown (supposedly 69/99) is not the card that is shown in the auction since the OP has a scan of 69/99 and based upon auto location they are not the same. I don't believe he is saying that all need to be identical but the one 69/99 should be identical to 69/99.
 
Be8el0ve

Be8el0ve

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
2,114
1
New Jersey
EricChavezCollector3 said:
RiceLynnEvans75 said:
The guy signed 99 of those cards. Kind of unrealistic to think they would have the auto in the same exact spot/position on each one.
Click to expand...

What the OP is saying (correct me if I am wrong) is that the card shown (supposedly 69/99) is not the card that is shown in the auction since the OP has a scan of 69/99 and based upon auto location they are not the same. I don't believe he is saying that all need to be identical but the one 69/99 should be identical to 69/99.
Click to expand...

+1

My friend actually pulled 69/99 back on November, 2009. Here are better pics he sent me of the original 69/99. Ask the seller to send another picture of the card in the auction then you can compare to these pics.

derek_jeter_rookie_001.jpg
derek_jeter_rookie_004.jpg
derek_jeter_rookie_006.jpg
derek_jeter_rookie_009.jpg
 
RiceLynnEvans75

RiceLynnEvans75

Active member
Feb 9, 2010
3,264
3
NOVA
EricChavezCollector3 said:
RiceLynnEvans75 said:
The guy signed 99 of those cards. Kind of unrealistic to think they would have the auto in the same exact spot/position on each one.
Click to expand...

What the OP is saying (correct me if I am wrong) is that the card shown (supposedly 69/99) is not the card that is shown in the auction since the OP has a scan of 69/99 and based upon auto location they are not the same. I don't believe he is saying that all need to be identical but the one 69/99 should be identical to 69/99.
Click to expand...

Ah, gotcha. My bad. That's what a quick two second look at a post before going out the door will do to ya.
 
vwnut13

vwnut13

Active member
Apr 19, 2009
8,004
0
Vermont
Russ S. said:
vwnut13 said:
nosterbor said:
itjust a freaking OUTRAGIOUS price!
Click to expand...

You sure about that?
Click to expand...
Been listed for at least 2 days. No bids, and the BIN wasn't hit, so yeah, pretty outrageous.
Has the card even sold for over $600 lately?
Click to expand...

You sure seem to know a lot about this card.

The last one sold on 9/4/10 for $1,580.00 (93/93)
The one before that sold on 8/5/10 for $1,500.00 (90/93)
The one before that sold on 8/2/10 for $499.99 (9/93)
The one before that sold on 7/27/10 for $1,300.00 (77/93)
The one before that sold on 7/7/10 for $1,299.00 (9/93)
The one before that sold on 6/12/10 for $1,825.00(76/93)
The one before that sold on 6/2/10 for $1,625.00 (3/93)


The one that sold for $499 was a BIN and it only lasted minutes.

Also, it is the only one that has ever sold for less than $885.55 (36/93 on 2/14/10 Valentines Day)

Visit MY WEBSITE, you might learn something.
 
vwnut13

vwnut13

Active member
Apr 19, 2009
8,004
0
Vermont
Oh, and do you see why that might be a good scam to pull off?

$1,399 isn't a horrible price, $999 is even better. If Jeter had another 2 HR game it would be snapped up like that.

I'm willing to bet that it is going to get a bid, unless people realize that the auction seems fishy.

Yes,

I have all the info you need to know in my sig.
 
A

ArtVandelay

New member
Jul 6, 2010
468
0
Not to mention the ebay listing photo is tiny and you cant enlarge it. I wonder why...

Also, I am not at all familiar with these, but shouldnt you get the UCD certification hologram with it too?
 
vwnut13

vwnut13

Active member
Apr 19, 2009
8,004
0
Vermont
How convenient...

!B3HRRC!BGk~$(KGrHqMOKi0E)UMo!rgjBMl!3izU-w~~_35.jpg

93front.jpg


The one currently on eBay has a scan of 93/93, the last to sell on eBay.

Scam Auction. IMO.
 
vwnut13

vwnut13

Active member
Apr 19, 2009
8,004
0
Vermont
Russ S. said:
vwnut13 said:
nosterbor said:
itjust a freaking OUTRAGIOUS price!
Click to expand...

You sure about that?
Click to expand...
Been listed for at least 2 days. No bids, and the BIN wasn't hit, so yeah, pretty outrageous.
Has the card even sold for over $600 lately?
Click to expand...


The $1,399 BIN has been hit.

10 Feedback buyer, and a seemingly fake auction.

Would like to know what was up with this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
Questionable Ebay bidders
Replies
5
Views
531
mrmopar
mrmopar
mrmopar
Probstein123 on ebay (for the billionth time)...if you buy from or use them to sell for you, you should read this!
Replies
9
Views
9K
jmc855
jmc855
gitarst182
Fanatics Live
Replies
0
Views
315
gitarst182
gitarst182
mrmopar
Refractor Identification Issue
Replies
13
Views
1K
Dilferules
Dilferules
Topnotchsy
Lineup card photomatch for Ripken's record-setting game
Replies
5
Views
860
Topnotchsy
Topnotchsy

Members online

Total: 429 (members: 1, guests: 428)

Latest posts

Top