- Thread starter
- #1
JoshHamilton
Well-known member
- Aug 7, 2008
- 12,205
- 320
Everyone ******* about the BCS, so here's your chance to offer a solution on how it can be improved. And don't complain that we need a playoff system. That's an NCAA decision, not a BCS decision.
I have no problem with the BCS method of ranking teams. None at all. Frankly, I'd rather put ranking teams in the hands of unbiased computers as opposed to ignorant voters who are on the same level as Strom Thurmond when it comes to change and progress.
My one suggestion:
Eliminate conference ties. That would solve nearly complaint. Put the 1-10th ranked teams in BCS bowl games. Don't give a special rule to Notre Dame, don't give the goddamned Big East an AQ (their conference should have had their AQ stripped in '03 when they lost Miami, VT, and BC) when they collectively suck. An 11-1 Boise St team getting snubbed for an 8-4 UConn team is a travesty. Oh, and get rid of the ACC as well. They've been irrelevant for about a decade.
That's really my only anti-BCS argument. It's WAY better than the retarded Bowl Alliance that we used to have. At least now, we get 1 vs. 2 for the championship
I have no problem with the BCS method of ranking teams. None at all. Frankly, I'd rather put ranking teams in the hands of unbiased computers as opposed to ignorant voters who are on the same level as Strom Thurmond when it comes to change and progress.
My one suggestion:
Eliminate conference ties. That would solve nearly complaint. Put the 1-10th ranked teams in BCS bowl games. Don't give a special rule to Notre Dame, don't give the goddamned Big East an AQ (their conference should have had their AQ stripped in '03 when they lost Miami, VT, and BC) when they collectively suck. An 11-1 Boise St team getting snubbed for an 8-4 UConn team is a travesty. Oh, and get rid of the ACC as well. They've been irrelevant for about a decade.
That's really my only anti-BCS argument. It's WAY better than the retarded Bowl Alliance that we used to have. At least now, we get 1 vs. 2 for the championship
