- Thread starter
- #1
TRAVISAKERS
New member
So last year brought him into the spotlight. I am wondering if he will return to huge power numbers again or if we will see a slump. I am projecting him at 36 HRs.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
cgilmo said:There was something going on with that blue jays team
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/TOR/2010.shtml
people popping homers left and right
ahill1 said:I heard somwhere that for the last couple of years he had the highest percentage of foul balls per at bat. Maybe working with Murphy he got his timing a bit better and straightened out some of those foul balls
cgilmo said:There was something going on with that blue jays team
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/TOR/2010.shtml
people popping homers left and right
There are a lot of problems with MLB's testing program. Just bc someone was tested and passed doesnt really mean anything.JzWand said:I will say 40 homeruns.
He was also tested randomly 3 times last season for the guys who say it has to be ped's!
elmalo said:There are a lot of problems with MLB's testing program. Just bc someone was tested and passed doesnt really mean anything.JzWand said:I will say 40 homeruns.
He was also tested randomly 3 times last season for the guys who say it has to be ped's!
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m ... _95677470/
elmalo said:There are a lot of problems with MLB's testing program. Just bc someone was tested and passed doesnt really mean anything.JzWand said:I will say 40 homeruns.
He was also tested randomly 3 times last season for the guys who say it has to be ped's!
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m ... _95677470/
markakis8 said:cgilmo said:There was something going on with that blue jays team
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/TOR/2010.shtml
people popping homers left and right
it was their approach at the plate based on Cito's game plan. you notice guys like Adam Lind and Aaron Hill took massive hits in batting average. Cito's game plan for everyone - go up and swing for the fences. so they did.
i think people will be surprised by the type of year that Bautista puts up next year. Will he hit 50 again? Most likely not. Will he hit 40? It's a possibility. I agree he'll be around 35ish.
this has been stated many times before, he changed his approach and swing at the end of the 2009 season. take a look at his month of september in 2009 compared to the rest of the year. take a look at his winter stats before 2010 season. based off of 12 solid months of consistent production at this level, i see no reason why he'll only hit 15-20 again next year barring injury.
I realize when the article is from, but those same things still apply today. And one thing that that article didnt really go into is timing the cycle. You can easily cyle on and off in the off season and be totally clean during the season. Everyone knows how strict the Olympic testing system is, yet they still have an extremely hard time catching athletes. So even with the gold standard testing, i.e the olympics, there are still tons of ways to easily pass the tests.aaron41984 said:elmalo said:There are a lot of problems with MLB's testing program. Just bc someone was tested and passed doesnt really mean anything.JzWand said:I will say 40 homeruns.
He was also tested randomly 3 times last season for the guys who say it has to be ped's!
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m ... _95677470/
That was written in 2002. There are tests for masking agents, hgh, insulin based, and water based steroids now. IIRC Volquez got caught despite masking and not having used for more than a month.