- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
jbhofmann said:They were redemptions but 128 out of over 1000 is not that high of a percentage.
ballerskrip said:jbhofmann said:They were redemptions but 198 out of over 1000 is not that high of a percentage.
198 / 1000, but i can guarantee that those 1,000 are all NOT different cards. Many of those have been submitted 2-3 times which messes up the numbers.
skrip
jbhofmann said:ballerskrip said:jbhofmann said:They were redemptions but 198 out of over 1000 is not that high of a percentage.
198 / 1000, but i can guarantee that those 1,000 are all NOT different cards. Many of those have been submitted 2-3 times which messes up the numbers.
skrip
My thousand figure was referring to the print run of the card, not how many have been graded.
jbhofmann said:They were redemptions but 198 out of over 1000 is not that high of a percentage.
George_Calfas said:jbhofmann said:They were redemptions but 198 out of over 1000 is not that high of a percentage.
how is ~20% not a "that high of a percentage"?
EricInCT said:George_Calfas said:jbhofmann said:They were redemptions but 198 out of over 1000 is not that high of a percentage.
how is ~20% not a "that high of a percentage"?
+1
Very hard to find a card that has 20% of the print run graded at all let alone gems.
masonphillip said:EricInCT said:George_Calfas said:jbhofmann said:They were redemptions but 198 out of over 1000 is not that high of a percentage.
how is ~20% not a "that high of a percentage"?
+1
Very hard to find a card that has 20% of the print run graded at all let alone gems.
As I said...1500-2000 is a better number for total PR.
Thus you'd have 10-15% that were gems.
Because Montero has been hot for long periods of time, TONS of these cards have been graded - it is THE card that I've seen most frequently in the BGS Group Sub on the boards here, hands down.
I'd say if you graded each and every BDCP card that came out every year, you'd have about 15%-25% of the total PR that would gem out.
ThoseBackPages said:
ArtVandelay said:You are talking about base autos right - not base card (BDPP86)?
Either way, take Chisenhalls or Stantons cards from that set. Most ref verstions are pretty OC. Kuddos to Topps for getting it right on a good percentage of the print run for Montero's cards. Most Stanton golds (mine included) are like 75/25. Really sours it when you pull a rare card and then get pissed and say "you know there's only 50 of these, couldnt they have at least taken their time cutting them properly!"
Now if BGS is handing out 9.5's on cards that dont deserve them thats a different story.