- Thread starter
- #1
Welcome to our community
Be apart of something great, join today!
Adams not heath bell to the rangers /erlin and weiland
- Thread starter jcmint
- Start date
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
tm decomposer
New member
- Aug 29, 2010
- 1,228
- 0
Re: Adams not heath bell to the rangers
Holy crap. I might become a Padres fan!
Holy crap. I might become a Padres fan!
- Thread starter
- #3
Hallsgator
New member
Re: Adams not heath bell to the rangers
Yea, but they got one of the best relievers in the game. They are serious WS contenders now. And the have control of Adams and Uehara for 2012.jcmint said:
tramers
Well-known member
no no 
tm decomposer
New member
- Aug 29, 2010
- 1,228
- 0
Re: Adams not heath bell to the rangers
Good relievers grow on trees. Between the Adrian deal and this, the Padres could have a very bright future.jcmint said:
padremurph
New member
- Aug 7, 2010
- 1,884
- 0
Re: Adams not heath bell to the rangers
Good relievers grow on trees. Between the Adrian deal and this, the Padres could have a very bright future.[/quote:2hxnncx0]tm decomposer said:
Seiya
Active member
Re: Adams not heath bell to the rangers
[/quote:1ef2ol73]
Amazing haul, everyone thought Heath was gone, Pads didn't expect teams to pay the price for Adams. :mrgreen:
padremurph said:
[/quote:1ef2ol73]Amazing haul, everyone thought Heath was gone, Pads didn't expect teams to pay the price for Adams. :mrgreen:
tramers
Well-known member
alabamalongsnake
New member
called selling high when wieland just had a no-no
good trade for rangers.
good trade for rangers.
Similar threads
