Should this be considered "Prime"?

klute14 · Jan 20, 2012

http://www.ebay.com/itm/250972506182?ss ... 1423.l2649

Bill Menard · Jan 20, 2012

klute14 said:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/250972506182?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649

You'd be shocked at what they considered "prime"...

I remember pulling a Todd Heap plain piece of jersey from a pack of Absolute Football, #'d to 25. I think this was in 2006. I emailed to ask how this was considered prime and if they made a mistake. I got a response asking for a scan. I sent it and I was told it's prime because it's black and that was a limited part of the jersey, so the black part of the jersey was considered prime. LOL

Sure.

Actually, on that one you posted, I think I'd consider that prime since it has a button hole - certainly donruss did, as that is a "limited part of the jersey"

Sjrmn91 · Jan 20, 2012

I personally consider button holes "prime" portions of a jersey.

1st4040 · Jan 20, 2012

thats not one of the red jersey prime designated cards so its probably the standard piece except for buttonhole for this version.

homerun28aa · Jan 20, 2012

Personally I consider it prime.

agentjak · Jan 20, 2012

homerun28aa said:
Personally I consider it prime.

................I agree with this..but this set actaully had the word "prime" on all their prime cards..so take that for what its worth.

bear0555 · Jan 20, 2012

What gets forgotten is that this set was rushed out and I don't believe Donruss/Playoff had time to distinguish the buttonholes from the base swatches for most cases. I have buttonholes from Cey and Carew from this set and have also owned the Kruk.

Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Should this be considered "Prime"?

klute14

Active member

Bill Menard

New member

Sjrmn91

New member

1st4040

Well-known member

homerun28aa

Active member

agentjak

Member

bear0555

Active member

Similar threads

Members online

Latest posts