1st4040
Well-known member
looks like a 94 Bowmans Best refractor to me...
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
You're certainly entitled to your opinion but this Ruth is seen by some as one of the greatest baseball portraits ever done....
...and it doesn't even show his entire face.
Now crop off the top of the hat and say the same thing.
Yup. Wouldn't want those on a card.
Sorry that I'm not a huge fan of a set that consists entirely of way too close up facial portraits, or 3/4 backside views.
Me too, when I look at the new Finest BB, there's no comparison..Tend to be +1 here
---
Buying Albert Belle cards! PM me!
National treasures was easily the product of the year. It was obviously the nice hits that drove the product. The photography took a back seat to the hits and people were completely fine with it. This is showing us that if the product has the hits customers will flock to it. Not many seemed to be bothered with the photography. If Panini keep son putting out nice and innovative products the licensing will not matter. There is such a void in the market for a product like National Treasures kudos to Panini for seeing it and satisfying that need.
Yes but the op was about how awesome Prizm is, which many of us do not agree with.