With the redemption wording, what keeps them from advertising and inserting whatever they want to sell a product and knowingly not have the ability to produce that hit and just replace it at the value they see fit just because of the wording? Didn't they do that with the Jimi Hendrix relic that was never obtained before release? Hasn't there been issues with Ginter autos (Sig Hansen) where the individuals didn't weren't approached to sign until after the product went live. These are definate cases of bait and switch.
What if they advertise a product with a guarantee of a Ruth cut in every case. When you open your case and pull the cut, it's a redemption and they say they weren't able to produce the card. So now they offer you a case of the product with the Ruth cut as a replacement. See the problem here?