Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Thoughts on 2014 Finest

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

NY Tony

New member
Mar 29, 2013
638
0
Hey everyone
Lots of 2014 topps finest baseball has started to hit eBay

Post your thoughts and any pickups here

So far seems like a whole big mish mosh of previous finest sets.. Great eye appeal but rather confusing...

I've seen many 96 finest redos
97 finest redos
And some sort or 99 ID Ionix looking base cards

I don't know the checklist for this but in sure it's going to be insane

Oh well
 

rsmath

Active member
Nov 8, 2008
6,086
1
I guess the Topps Representative that is supposed to witness the signings was either eating donuts or taking a #1 because there are smudged autos in this product. You'd think the rep would notice that during the signing and correct the situation.

Oh that's right, unless it's a certain group of athletes that makes Topps O, I highly doubt the autos were witnessed.
 

BBCgalaxee

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2011
6,475
59
So far, product looks awesome with all the colors on the base cards.

Retro inserts also super cool.
 

Mighty Bombjack

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
6,115
12
I guess the Topps Representative that is supposed to witness the signings was either eating donuts or taking a #1 because there are smudged autos in this product. You'd think the rep would notice that during the signing and correct the situation.

Oh that's right, unless it's a certain group of athletes that makes Topps O, I highly doubt the autos were witnessed.
As someone who has been that Topps witness for a few signings, I can tell you that our job is not to look at the autos or do any type of quality control. All we are expected to do is make sure the person on the card is the one signing it.
 

Topnotchsy

Featured Contributor, The best players in history?
Aug 7, 2008
9,448
176
From what came up in eBay searches:

Some cool looking cards but tao many variations it is confusing, and nothing that I think will be particularly memorable.
 

JoshHamilton

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
12,205
320
Love the design. The colored refractors are kind of confusing. Haven't held any in hand yet though.

If the Stanton or Trout Supers show up, I'll win them
 

Philip J. Fry

Well-known member
Aug 9, 2008
5,778
404
Ohio
Don't forget, they also have the 1994 design in there, as [MENTION=1720]cgilmo[/MENTION] pointed out to me last night.

trout.JPG
 

CubsfanP

Active member
May 21, 2012
1,067
1
Greenwood, IN
This product is for those who want a rookie auto of the 2014 class, but can't drop the money on a Bowman/Bowman Chrome type product.

It will have more hits for your dollar, however the value and demand for those hits will be much less then their chrome counterpart.

It has been said already, but IMO, this or another product needs to be scrapped. All it does is flood the market with cheap autos and devalue the rest of the better product.

If I had my say, I agree that Platinum and Finest would be scrapped. Possibly Bowman or Bowman Chrome as well.
 

gmarutiak

Active member
Jul 23, 2010
1,386
2
Baltimore, MD
As someone who has been that Topps witness for a few signings, I can tell you that our job is not to look at the autos or do any type of quality control. All we are expected to do is make sure the person on the card is the one signing it.

You have to admit, as a Topps witness, it would be kind of fun to yell, "DAMMIT SANDY, YOU SMUDGED ANOTHER ONE!!!"
 

ASTROBURN

Active member
Jun 23, 2011
4,576
0
Santa Cruz, CA
Base plus ten different refractors? Jesus, hasnt the refractors overload been done to death?

If they are trying to reclaim the feeling of previous finest products, then do base and a single refractor. That should be plenty.

And no Bagwell? Thank the stars...
 
Last edited:

RStadlerASU22

Active member
Jan 2, 2013
8,881
11
Posted on another thread , but this is what I see with the Greats
<<<

I may pick some up and build a set. I think they do look great. There are some things that I dislike from and OCD / visual standpoint. I wish they didn't do so many versions, I wish the checklist was a lil longer (20-24 cards) , I hate how Ozzie signed on that angle vs across the auto spot and same w/ Carlton signing so low.



When it comes to the versions as of now I am confused as to what is base etc. Going through the 12 here is what I see so far ....



Bo - Only 1 /125 listed no others



Banks - Mix of all but it seems his bass is the /125 Blue Refractor ?



Griffey - Only some Gold and Red listed



Brock - Only 1 Gold and the rest are all XFractor /149 are there



McGwire - Only a Gold /50 listed



Rivera - Good mix , what is base ?



Schmidt - Good mix , is Blue Ref base ?



Ozzie - Good mix , is Blue Ref base ?



Randy - Only Gold Atomic listed



Young - Good mix , but XFractor /149 seems to be base ?



Carlton - Good mix is Blue Ref base ?



Koufax - Only 2 Black and 1 Gold listed





So it's confusing as to what makes a set at this point
>>>>




Ryan
 

SINFULONE

Active member
Sep 26, 2008
5,691
0
Disappointed so many of the parallels are jacked up.Was looking forward going after the red refractors of my team, but cards don't even look like red refractors (too many other colors on the border ruin them).A red refractor is supposed to be red, not some mixture of 247 other colors printed on them.
 

JoshHamilton

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
12,205
320
I bought a box today. I plan on getting inappropriately drunk and filming the break. I'll post it here if I can figure out how to post it online.

Imagine Drunk History crossed with Bob Eucker in Major League. It'll be a ******* disaster
 

Members online

Top