wolfmanalfredo
Active member
Zan I've noticed in the past, and with this submission that from the scans, it seems like you get shafted on the grades. Some amazing eye appeal, especially with the Wide Pen, and that R312
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
The backs on these cards don't have the best backs. The wide pen and the R312 have paper loss on the corners, and the R303 has glue residue on the back. The R346 has pen written on the back, so the grades are what they are because of the backs essentially haha. As I have submitted more and more to SGC I am paying more attention to every feature of the cards I submit. I love the cards I submitted this time for exactly what you said, so much eye appeal in every one really.wolfmanalfredo said:Zan I've noticed in the past, and with this submission that from the scans, it seems like you get shafted on the grades. Some amazing eye appeal, especially with the Wide Pen, and that R312
TNP777 said:
gojacks said:TNP777 said:
Actually your rite. My bad. I must have read that History of Topps card I have wrong. Thanx for correcting me.
AK11 said:
My search is hopefully over putting the one T206 card in my pc for good. After buying and selling select T206's, the one I always wanted was a Lajoie portrait. Now I have the highest graded I can afford. It has a common Piedmont 350 back, but a 5.5 is considered high grade to me without forking over grand or more. It is a nice card for being a century old and PSA doesn't give out .5 grades lightly.