10/11 Contenders - Variants considered Rookies?

Guest · Feb 17, 2011

So I saw today in the Panini video that the variants are numbered (in the set) 151-200 with the regular logo versions 101-150. It's a 200 card set.

Would you consider a complete set 1-150 w/ the actual rookies?

OR

1-200 with both versions of the rookies?

rymflaherty · Feb 18, 2011

if the "set" is 1-200 I would consider all 200 as the set.

if each has an independent number - you may not like that there are multiple cards of each player.....but I think they have to be part of the set. As it's not a situation where the variations are the same card # as the regular card......then it could be considered a complete set w/o variations.

kris24bryan · Feb 18, 2011

rymflaherty said:
if the "set" is 1-200 I would consider all 200 as the set.

if each has an independent number - you may not like that there are multiple cards of each player.....but I think they have to be part of the set. As it's not a situation where the variations are the same card # as the regular card......then it could be considered a complete set w/o variations.

This is totally correct.

Guest · Feb 19, 2011

Yeah, I know. Just trying to justify not having to spend another pile of cash to get a secondary rookie.

rymflaherty · Feb 21, 2011

Berry82 said:
Yeah, I know. Just trying to justify not having to spend another pile of cash to get a secondary rookie.

:lol:

Well if it's a set your collecting to hang on to......I think it would still be cool without the variations. You'd still have everybody and you'd actually have the "true RC's"....so to me that'd be the most important part of the set, then maybe decide on the variations based on how rare/pricey they wind up.

Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

10/11 Contenders - Variants considered Rookies?

Guest

Guest

rymflaherty

New member

kris24bryan

New member

Guest

Guest

rymflaherty

New member

Similar threads

Members online

Latest posts