User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 1998 finest No Protectors?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,187
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    1998 finest No Protectors?

    I was looking through my Andruw Jones list today and came accross this. I decided to look it up on Beckett to see what the difference was. Here is Beckett's explanation:

    Randomly inserted in retail packs at the rate of one in two and one in every HTA pack, this 275-card set is parallel to the base set only without the Finest Protector covering and features double-sided Finest technology.

    So what I gather, retails packs carried cards without the protective covering that you can peel off? Is there something I am missing? This doesn't seem to be a parallel at all. Basically you can just peel off the protective covering and it is now a parallel? Oddly enough, the "No Protector" version is valued at $2 more than the regular version?

    If someone could shed some light on this, I would greatly appreciate it.
    Collecting Andruw Jones HR ticket stubs:
    321 of 389 tickets
    82% complete
    HR Tickets

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    786
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: 1998 finest No Protectors?

    On the regular finest the back was printed on just regular glossy paper but on the No Peel the back was printed with the same Finest chrome finish like as the front. So the No Peels were dual side Finest while the regulars just had the one sided Finest.
    TRADE LIST
    https://s7.photobucket.com/albums/y28.../Trade%20List/

    Looking for these cards if you have them lmk
    Jeff Van Note 1991 Hoby SEC Stars Autographs
    Chad Petty 2001 Topps Reserve Autograph both versions

  3. #3
    Administrator sheetskout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    5,385
     brewtowncardboard
     jordo2323
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: 1998 finest No Protectors?

    Yeah! I had a couple boxes of 98' Finest and never really understood that either.

    Either way, you'd think the version with the protective coating still in tact would be worth more either way.....

    I think this may be the twilight zone.
    ----------SIGNATURE STARTS HERE-----------

    FOLLOW SHEETSKOUT ON TWiTTER!

    PHOTOBUCKET PROSPECTS

  4. #4
    Senior Member Philip J. Fry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,511
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: 1998 finest No Protectors?

    As you stated in your original post from Beckett, the no-peel versions had both sides with the chrome technology instead of just the front. Even the refractors have both sides with the refractor technology.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,187
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: 1998 finest No Protectors?

    Thanks for clearing this up. I was hopeful there was more to it than what I originally thought.
    Collecting Andruw Jones HR ticket stubs:
    321 of 389 tickets
    82% complete
    HR Tickets

  6. #6
    Senior Member Philip J. Fry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,511
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: 1998 finest No Protectors?

    Quote Originally Posted by AndruwHRJones
    Thanks for clearing this up. I was hopeful there was more to it than what I originally thought.
    The refractors look amazing, fyi

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    charlotte
    Posts
    372
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: 1998 finest No Protectors?

    i dont know about ratio per retail/hobby, but the no protectors have a chrome finish on the reverse. therefore the no protectors are also thinner, since its metallically on both sides rather than having a chrome front and paper stock reverse. the no protector refractors ALSO have a refractor finish on the REVERSE. this way you can tell the differences between a real one and a card that has been peeled. it is confusion like this that has put almost NO PREMIUM on the no-protector version over their regular counterparts (ei. refractors with peels sell about the same price as the no-protector).
    stuck in the 90's, -sy

    dont peel cards, or else

    my bagwell wantlist:
    #1 2004 Upper Deck Power Up Blue Mega Rare #60 1000 Points
    #2 2002 Fleer Platinum Fence Busters GU BAT #3 ltd. to 400 sets



  8. #8
    Senior Member WCTYSON's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    7,085
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just message a moderator to remove the account, instead of spreading the SPAM by quoting the site address.
    "...it just sounded to me like he felt like he did not do it."

  9. #9
    Senior Member gracecollector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Huntley, IL
    Posts
    6,382
     gracecollector
    Mentioned
    285 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Terrible idea by Topps. At least it was a short lived idea. You really can't tell difference from a peeled Protector and a Non-Protector from the front.

    Base / No-Protector / Refractor / No-Protector Refractor - I need to scan backs to show real difference.


  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,071
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gracecollector View Post
    Terrible idea by Topps. At least it was a short lived idea. You really can't tell difference from a peeled Protector and a Non-Protector from the front.
    The no-protector items are darker and look metallic on back but your right from the front its difficult in person and nearly impossible using just a picture. Any regular Finest will have smoother and more shiny surface on both sides.

    Left is the regular issue = right is a no protector
    While the left is a refractor same thing on a regular base- next to a no protector will always be obvious.

    No protectors ALWAYS look darker like the picture is out of focus. Its just that it is actually darker, the finish is dull, and the front more sedated.
    My take from busting countless cases of the product.





Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •