budvandall
New member
that you Bruce??
nope talking about this set, I got all the paper work with mine, and one on EBAY stated about the 200 signed, which then I remembered about that sheet that stated he signed 200, maybe theres 200 random sets no order the numbering maybe?
maybe 40 of each 100 , that be 40X5=200.........
neverless kinda weird
it could be quite possible that sheet that states 200 might be a typo too, might have meant to read 500?
I've never seen a numbered non auto set/single like theses ever listed
I think he signed all 500 sets. Why would he number them 000/500 if he only signed 200 sets. If he did only sign 200 sets, why is the numbering all over the place?