ASTROBURN
Active member
[MENTION=3754]MansGame[/MENTION] i started the Bagwell one, and there was only two of us to start. Now theres three, with a few visitors...
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
I agree with you and the changing of serial number comment. I also find it annoying that in one set the reds are the 1/1s and in the next set their the /5 and the green is the 1/1s but the green was /199 before. Or even worse, one set the silver ink is 1/1 and then it's red in the next set and silver is /25.
---
Buying Albert Belle cards! PM me!
I enjoy parallels when they are limited to about 5 or less and they need to be different enough to notice (border color, foil colors). Numbering them differently as the only difference is lame and boring. I would be perfectly happy only adding 15-20 new cards per year, as that seems to be the case, but no ways those 15-20 cards for me are all numbered to 25 or less it seems! I have debated stopping the collection at the current year and only filling in gaps from older sets because I am tired of the new, high end releases, filled with ultra low serial numbers to chase. I have a hard time resisting them and there is enough competition to drive prices upwards into the "no return" range now, not that it guides my collecting, but someday this stuff either gets resold or tossed and it would be nice to think that some of it may increase in resale value above what it cost me!!
I've said this before, but if the top 1-2 player collectors drew the line on going after their players, the secondary market might just crash!
For my Juan Gonzalez collection
1998 Topps Tek. Still have not completed this set. I am 9 short
1998 Topps Tek Diffractors . Forget about it! 59 of these have never been seen. I have 1 sold 5 off.
2004 Leaf Exhibits.43 card set. Still need 1
2004 Leaf Exhibits Second Edition. 43 card set. This is as bad as the 98 Diffractors there are 15 that have never been seen 13 have a print run of 46-66.
For my Aramis Ramirez collection.
2007 Topps Moments and Milestones 92 cards
Base serial numbered to 150. I need 1
Black serial numbered to 25. I need 52
Blue serial numbered to 10. I have 12
Red 1/1 I have 15
I love all these sets! It is what keeps me collecting. The thrill of the hunt.[/QUOTE]
I agree with this. Its what makes collecting fun Plus, mail days are awesome too
For my Juan Gonzalez collection
1998 Topps Tek. Still have not completed this set. I am 9 short
1998 Topps Tek Diffractors . Forget about it! 59 of these have never been seen. I have 1 sold 5 off.
2004 Leaf Exhibits.43 card set. Still need 1
2004 Leaf Exhibits Second Edition. 43 card set. This is as bad as the 98 Diffractors there are 15 that have never been seen 13 have a print run of 46-66.
For my Aramis Ramirez collection.
2007 Topps Moments and Milestones 92 cards
Base serial numbered to 150. I need 1
Black serial numbered to 25. I need 52
Blue serial numbered to 10. I have 12
Red 1/1 I have 15
I love all these sets! It is what keeps me collecting. The thrill of the hunt.[/QUOTE]
I agree with this. Its what makes collecting fun Plus, mail days are awesome too
"Plus, mail days are awesome too"
Yes, you got that right.
Here is something the think about.
I just hit 650 Unique in my Aramis Ramirez collection.
All serial numbered to 25 or less.
Had a reply but lost it
Freedomcardboard.com is not responding! Internet explorer must close program
Sometimes parallels are easier to find than the base cards. Agree?
I don't like guesswork.I also hate how Topps keeps changing the quantity of a specfic parallel every damn year.One year blue refractors are numbered to 150, next year 99, then the next year 199.Just pick one quantity and stick with it every year.Also do not like the XXXXload of parallels today.I can't even tell the difference between the yellow and gold refractors.And look on eBay at all the erroneous listings calling pink refractors red refractors and vice versa.I recently almost bid on a pink refractor thinking it was a red refractor because the seller listed it wrong.Thankfully I saw the numbering before I bid.
Sometimes parallels are easier to find than the base cards. Agree?
Yes.
...it's worse than you think...
2013 Bowman Products alone.
Blue Refractor: Bowman #/250 | Bowman Chrome #/250 | Bowman Draft #/99
Pink Refractor: Bowman NONE | Bowman Chrome #/35 | Bowman Draft NONE
Black Refractor: Bowman #/99 | Bowman Chrome #/15 | Bowman Draft #/35
Green Refractor: Bowman NONE | Bowman Chrome RETAIL | Bowman Draft #/75