The 1998 Topps Tek Thread

BenG76 said:

I have a few 98 Tek's on the way I can hopefully share soon. Are there threads for 99 and 2000 I have been scooping up a few of them as well.

Click to expand...

SINFULONE said:

Wish there was more love for '99 and '00.

Click to expand...

BenG76 said:

Maybe we should start a thread on 99 and 2000 Tek

Click to expand...

SINFULONE said:

Just show them off here.I don't hate on any of them.

Click to expand...

BenG76 said:

Will do. I have been picking up several from all 3 years so far. Still trying to figure out 200 Tek. They are all cool looking cards. I am picking up what Cubs I can find that are reasonably priced. I saw there were few to pick from on COMC and sportslots the patterns don't seem to be labeled it just has the card number.

Click to expand...

SINFULONE said:

Just show them off here.I don't hate on any of them.

Click to expand...

BenG76 said:

Will do. I have been picking up several from all 3 years so far. Still trying to figure out 200 Tek. They are all cool looking cards. I am picking up what Cubs I can find that are reasonably priced. I saw there were few to pick from on COMC and sportslots the patterns don't seem to be labeled it just has the card number.

Click to expand...

Gwynn545 said:

I would think twice before posting 1999 and 2000 in the 1998 thread:

RCW 9.41.190 Unlawful posting of non-specific Tek cards in said FCB thread — Penalty — Exceptions.

(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to post, exhibit, display, or mention any Topps Tek card from a non-specified year, namely 1999 and 2000, or any other Tek insert apparently mimicking a 1998 Tek, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to draw attention to, or that warrants alarm for the enjoyment of other persons.

(2) Any person violating the provisions of subsection (1) above shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor. If any person is convicted of a violation of subsection (1) of this section, the person shall lose his or her FCB log-in ability, if any. The Admin, @George_Calfas, shall send notice of the revocation to the supervisor admin, @cgilmo, and to the city, town, or county which offending member resides.

(3) Subsection (1) of this section shall not apply to or affect the following:

(a) Any 99 or 00 Tek committed by a person while in the background of his or her place of abode or fixed place of business while photographing 1998 Teks;

(b) Any person who by virtue of his or her office or public employment is vested by law with a duty to preserve 90's inserts, maintain 90's related threads, or to make Ebay links to and, while in the performance of such duty;

(c) Any person asking questions about 99 or 00 Teks for the purpose of comparing, or expanding topics, while himself or herself subjects to the uses of 1998 Teks, or for the purpose of reinvigorating another against the use of such unlawful posting of 99 and 00 Teks by a third person;

(d) Any person making or displaying rare, misidentified test issues or promos (Leximo); or

(e) Any person engaged in military activities sponsored by the federal or state governments.


[1994 sp.s. c 7 § 426; 1969 c 8 § 1.]

Click to expand...

MansGame said:

[MENTION=2602]SINFULONE[/MENTION] - what's up with your quotes? Looks weird via my mobile. Maybe okay on PC.


---
Buying Albert Belle cards! PM me!

Click to expand...

MansGame said:

@SINFULONE - what's up with your quotes? Looks weird via my mobile. Maybe okay on PC.


---
Buying Albert Belle cards! PM me!

Click to expand...

Gwynn545 said:

I would think twice before posting 1999 and 2000 in the 1998 thread:

[h=2]RCW 9.41.190[/h][h=1]Unlawful posting of non-specific Tek cards in said FCB thread — Penalty — Exceptions.[/h]

(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to post, exhibit, display, or mention any Topps Tek card from a non-specified year, namely 1999 and 2000, or any other Tek insert apparently mimicking a 1998 Tek, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to draw attention to, or that warrants alarm for the enjoyment of other persons.

(2) Any person violating the provisions of subsection (1) above shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor. If any person is convicted of a violation of subsection (1) of this section, the person shall lose his or her FCB log-in ability, if any. The Admin, [MENTION=2418]George_Calfas[/MENTION], shall send notice of the revocation to the supervisor admin, [MENTION=1720]cgilmo[/MENTION], and to the city, town, or county which offending member resides.

(3) Subsection (1) of this section shall not apply to or affect the following:

(a) Any 99 or 00 Tek committed by a person while in the background of his or her place of abode or fixed place of business while photographing 1998 Teks;

(b) Any person who by virtue of his or her office or public employment is vested by law with a duty to preserve 90's inserts, maintain 90's related threads, or to make Ebay links to and, while in the performance of such duty;

(c) Any person asking questions about 99 or 00 Teks for the purpose of comparing, or expanding topics, while himself or herself subjects to the uses of 1998 Teks, or for the purpose of reinvigorating another against the use of such unlawful posting of 99 and 00 Teks by a third person;

(d) Any person making or displaying rare, misidentified test issues or promos (Leximo); or

(e) Any person engaged in military activities sponsored by the federal or state governments.


[1994 sp.s. c 7 § 426; 1969 c 8 § 1.]

Click to expand...

rinkrat38 said:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/LOT-52-Baseball-2000-2004-Topps-Tek-Diffractors-Randy-Johnson-Scott-Rolen-J5-/131099226087?pt=US_Baseball&hash=item1e861f6fe7

New lot of what is mostly 1998 Teks. Fair number of them heavily spotted too. Includes Belle, Lankford and a couple of Buhner. This seller did have a few 1998 diffractors in his(her?) last lot, but none in this despite the listing title. Not sure which card is supposed to be the newly discovered 2004 Tek.

Click to expand...