Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Yea I said that out loud. Just imagine, those were probably a buck apiece a couple years ago.
Possibly something in 2002 BC Draft?
Very well said. Good read!Not what I expected when I saw "good old days".
To me, that is still an example of the bad new days of "collecting", trickling down to even the base cards. No base card, rookie or otherwise, of any 4th year player should be "worth" that much so soon after their debut, or ever for that matter. Let's use Garry Templeton as an example. Check out his first 4 years. Not quite the same as Trout, but he was certainly one of the better players at the time and had 4 years under his belt as a 23 year old in 1979 when he hit .314 and lead the league in hits and triples. That was also the year he had at least 100 hits from either side of the plate. He is still one of only two guys to ever do that. This guy was the real deal! Within 2 years, the Padres would be trading away a young SS by the name of Ozzie Smith to the Cardinals to obtain this 25 year old switch hitting phenom. We all know what happened next. Imagine if cards back then were like they are today, how much that 1977 Topps Templeton card would set you back in 1979!! I've always loved that card, by the way.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/t/templga01.shtml
I can see high grade vintage cards increasing exponentially in value because of a star players contribution, but more so the scarcity of top grade copies having survived the cruel and dangerous world of pre-boom collecting habits (rubber bands, bike spokes, flipping, shoe boxes, etc). That is exactly what "collecting" has become to many these days, prospecting/speculating and all about the value.
The good old days of collecting to me, and I am not that old, is buying packs of cards because you love the cards and being excited to get your favorite team or player and not concerning yourself about what the perceived value of that card is or trading with your friends to complete that latest set and it might have meant a Jim Rice card for a Tucker Ashford card, because you needed that Ashford and your buddy needed Rice and nobody cared that Rice was better.
Yes, that world of collecting is long gone, I know. However, I still have at least one long time trade partner where neither of us gives much consideration of values, where it is more about the teams involved.
Not what I expected when I saw "good old days".
To me, that is still an example of the bad new days of "collecting", trickling down to even the base cards. No base card, rookie or otherwise, of any 4th year player should be "worth" that much so soon after their debut, or ever for that matter. Let's use Garry Templeton as an example. Check out his first 4 years. Not quite the same as Trout, but he was certainly one of the better players at the time and had 4 years under his belt as a 23 year old in 1979 when he hit .314 and lead the league in hits and triples. That was also the year he had at least 100 hits from either side of the plate. He is still one of only two guys to ever do that. This guy was the real deal! Within 2 years, the Padres would be trading away a young SS by the name of Ozzie Smith to the Cardinals to obtain this 25 year old switch hitting phenom. We all know what happened next. Imagine if cards back then were like they are today, how much that 1977 Topps Templeton card would set you back in 1979!! I've always loved that card, by the way.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/t/templga01.shtml
I can see high grade vintage cards increasing exponentially in value because of a star players contribution, but more so the scarcity of top grade copies having survived the cruel and dangerous world of pre-boom collecting habits (rubber bands, bike spokes, flipping, shoe boxes, etc). That is exactly what "collecting" has become to many these days, prospecting/speculating and all about the value.
The good old days of collecting to me, and I am not that old, is buying packs of cards because you love the cards and being excited to get your favorite team or player and not concerning yourself about what the perceived value of that card is or trading with your friends to complete that latest set and it might have meant a Jim Rice card for a Tucker Ashford card, because you needed that Ashford and your buddy needed Rice and nobody cared that Rice was better.
Yes, that world of collecting is long gone, I know. However, I still have at least one long time trade partner where neither of us gives much consideration of values, where it is more about the teams involved.
