Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Griffey or Pujols?

Griffey or Pujols

  • Ken Griffey Jr

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    41

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

NerfXerks

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
1,424
Reaction score
0
The question is not who is better now, it's a question of who will wind up a better player.

My money's on Pujols.
 

Sly

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,874
Reaction score
0
Griffey in his prime, any day of the week. Griffey has one thing that Pujols lacks...speed.

Ultimately in the end, Griffey is arguably the best player of the 90's and Pujols will end up being the best player of the 00's.

You can't go wrong either way.
 

rob167

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,141
Reaction score
0
Location
Ankeny, Iowa
no contest........griffey lost too much time in his prime due to injuries. this coming from a cub fan (voting for a cardinal).
 

sheetskout

New member
Administrator
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
5,385
Reaction score
0
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Sly said:
Griffey in his prime, any day of the week. Griffey has one thing that Pujols lacks...speed.

Ultimately in the end, Griffey is arguably the best player of the 90's and Pujols will end up being the best player of the 00's.

You can't go wrong either way.

Griffey also never put up huge batting averages as Pujols does.
 

subpop77

New member
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
5,600
Reaction score
0
Location
Marshall, Texas, United States
mlbsalltimegreats said:
Yea Im a big grif fan but went with Pujols so long as he stay's healthy!!

I have to agree it's all about staying healthy. There are quite a few players that would be up there in the numbers if it wasn't for injuries, hell look at Frank Thomas I believe he would have gotten to 500 before the '07 season & Bo Jackson without the damn hip injury theres no telling what kind of #'s he would of had put up.
2_cents.gif
 

IndyManning18

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
15,306
Reaction score
0
Location
Indianapolis
I voted for Griffey because he's my all-time favorite. I don't think you can compare the two because of the positions they play. They're both great. Pujols will be the better hitter when it's all said and done, IMO. Griffey however will have been the better player.
 
S

stanthemanmusial

Guest
With no doubt, Pujols will end up being the better player. Pujols is the best hitter since Ted Williams. The final career stats on Pujols should be pretty amazing when it's all said and done.

P.S. For anyone to knock Pujols on speed, they must not watch him play. He is pretty darn quick when he turns it on, and is very smart as a base runner.
 

markakis8

Active member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
12,081
Reaction score
2
They are extremely close. Pujols has the higher BA and greater OBP but what Griffey did in the outfield to compliment his bat rivals Willie Mays. Nuff said.

I voted for Pujols though. Guy is literally a freak of nature.

sheetskout said:
Sly said:
Griffey in his prime, any day of the week. Griffey has one thing that Pujols lacks...speed.

Ultimately in the end, Griffey is arguably the best player of the 90's and Pujols will end up being the best player of the 00's.

You can't go wrong either way.

Griffey also never put up huge batting averages as Pujols does.
 

fengzhang

New member
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
1,803
Reaction score
0
Location
Chicago, IL
In their primes, I'd take Griffey. Griffey in his prime had more power and was more of a RBI machine. Pujols is probably the better hitter (higher batting average, less strikeouts) but in my opinion, for a slugger, OPS and HR/AB, RBI/AB, and RUNS/AB are more important statistics.

The biggest difference is in their defense. Pujols is no slouch but Griffey was one of the greatest centerfielders to play the game.

Griffey looked like a lock for greatness and 756 HR's and he tailed off massively. It will be interesting to see what happens with Pujols and his injuries.
 

craiger122003

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
5,542
Reaction score
0
Location
vegas
Hard choice if griffey stayed healthy i might lean to him but pujols
Honestly Griff is my favorite all time fav player always will be unfortunately his hard work and hard play led to his injuries if healthy i truly believe he would be the all time hime run leader no DOUBT!!!





sheetskout said:
Sly said:
Griffey in his prime, any day of the week. Griffey has one thing that Pujols lacks...speed.

Ultimately in the end, Griffey is arguably the best player of the 90's and Pujols will end up being the best player of the 00's.

You can't go wrong either way.

Griffey also never put up huge batting averages as Pujols does.
 

craiger122003

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
5,542
Reaction score
0
Location
vegas
Hate to tell you but pujols is the #2 most collected player behind derek(i play average in a big city) jeter followed by arod

ThoseBackPages said:
Pujols will NEVER touch Griffey in Cardboard Land Popularity
 

Mozzie22

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
1,656
Reaction score
28
I'll have to disagree that Griffey had more power than Pujols. Pujols hits homers one handed to opposite field! I'm not knocking Griffey but if Pujols could manage to stay healthy (and get any protection at all) he could put up some freakish statistics.

Interesting side note, when Griffey first came up I couldn't stand him! I thought he was brash and arrogant. Looking back now I realize how tame he was. I now watch embarrassments to the game like Manny and I really appreciate Griffey's talent.

fengzhang said:
In their primes, I'd take Griffey. Griffey in his prime had more power and was more of a RBI machine. Pujols is probably the better hitter (higher batting average, less strikeouts) but in my opinion, for a slugger, OPS and HR/AB, RBI/AB, and RUNS/AB are more important statistics.

The biggest difference is in their defense. Pujols is no slouch but Griffey was one of the greatest centerfielders to play the game.

Griffey looked like a lock for greatness and 756 HR's and he tailed off massively. It will be interesting to see what happens with Pujols and his injuries.
 
S

stanthemanmusial

Guest
fengzhang said:
In their primes, I'd take Griffey. Griffey in his prime had more power and was more of a RBI machine. Pujols is probably the better hitter (higher batting average, less strikeouts) but in my opinion, for a slugger, OPS and HR/AB, RBI/AB, and RUNS/AB are more important statistics.

The biggest difference is in their defense. Pujols is no slouch but Griffey was one of the greatest centerfielders to play the game.

Griffey looked like a lock for greatness and 756 HR's and he tailed off massively. It will be interesting to see what happens with Pujols and his injuries.

You might wanna go back and review those stats, and you will see Pujols has trumped Griffey in almost all of those categories you mentioned.

Also, you must not watch Pujols play, if you think Griffey had more power in his prime, than Albert does. Pujols clearly has more power than Griffey did in his prime. And as another poster mentioned, Pujols hits many of his out to the opposite field one handed. Griffey was/is a pull hitter for the most part. Pujols uses the entire field, because he is a more complete hitter than Griffey ever was.

Pujols is by far the better hitter, and the batting averages are not even close, even if you take Griffey's best batting averages in his prime. Griffey never hit .330 or higher, and only topped .320 twice. Pujols has already batted .330 or better (5) times. He has hit over .350 (2) times.
 

Halonut

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
4,106
Reaction score
0
IndyMann said:
I voted for Griffey because he's my all-time favorite. I don't think you can compare the two because of the positions they play. They're both great. Pujols will be the better hitter when it's all said and done, IMO. Griffey however will have been the better player.


ditto :D
 
S

stanthemanmusial

Guest
Brad said:
Griffey is the best. Period.

How can that be a valid statement, when Pujols has done in his first 8 seasons, what no other player in MLB history has ever done?
 

Members online

Top