Stan Musial Custom...which looks better?

[Mizzourah]

Making a custom to have signed for Musial and can't decide which I like better. So I made a quick little mock-up with a signature for you guys to help me decide. Which one do you like better?

#1:

#2:

Thanks

 

[JackLondon]

I like the first one, as it is not a photo that has been used very often.

 

[alexs64]

I would love the first one if you tidyed up the Cards logo...it looks great otherwise!

 

[Zambrano38]

I like the first one; it would look nice autographed in red!

 

[Jastermereel]

I like #1 also, but know going in that Musial's signature is a shadow of it's former self.

 

[A_Pharis]

I like #1 also, but know going in that Musial's signature is a shadow of it's former self.

Just wanted to echo this. Though getting a signature in any form from Mr. Musial is great -- don't expect that quality.

 

[Mizzourah]

The logo hasn't been feathered yet, this was just a quick mock up.

The deal is...I'm making a bunch of these and I'm going to send them out for Spring Training TTM's. All of the ones I make will have modern players with color pictures, so would the black and white look out of place with the rest?

 

[jeff_bichel]

You should go with the 1st example.

Congratulations on using the correct grammar - comparative rather than superlative - in the title of your post. It's nice to see that you were paying attention in school!

 

[chromerookies]

I chose the first one even though I like them both but the picture on the 2nd is very popular and the 1st hasn't been used that much which gives it that "New/I haven't seen this before" look