Official Error and Variation Discussion/Reference Thread

Yanks2151 · May 24, 2016

Here is one that's a head scratcher. 1998 UD SPx Vinny Castilla pictured on front and the back is Tino Martinez and its serial numbered. You wonder how many in that run are like this. How does this even happen.

Hawk8 · May 24, 2016

Yanks2151 said:
Here is one that's a head scratcher. 1998 UD SPx Vinny Castilla pictured on front and the back is Tino Martinez and its serial numbered. You wonder how many in that run are like this. How does this even happen.

That's pretty cool, love picking up Dawsons like that

Tfangman · May 24, 2016

1996 Leaf Limited Lumberjacks of Frank Thomas. These are all numbered to /5000 except...

chippercards.com · May 24, 2016

Whoa...

Tfangman said:
1996 Leaf Limited Lumberjacks of Frank Thomas. These are all numbered to /5000 except...

RStadlerASU22 · May 24, 2016

Tfangman said:
1996 Leaf Limited Lumberjacks of Frank Thomas. These are all numbered to /5000 except...

That's a cool one. Have you seen any other examples of it?

Ryan

Yanks2151 · May 25, 2016

Lou Whitaker front with an off center Dave Winfield back

banjar · May 25, 2016

I haven't seen mention of this variation yet...1989 Upper Deck normal vs. bold font. It's subtle but if you look closely there is definitely a difference between font thickness on both front and back. I had several of both kinds in my duplicates so I would bet it was an intentional change in the font versus just a printing variation. This is definitely splitting hairs on what is a really a "variation", but since I was able to add a 1989 variation to my collection with no effort, I'm calling this one totally legit

Normal on the left, bold on the right.

Yanks2151 · May 26, 2016

banjar said:
I haven't seen mention of this variation yet...1989 Upper Deck normal vs. bold font. It's subtle but if you look closely there is definitely a difference between font thickness on both front and back. I had several of both kinds in my duplicates so I would bet it was an intentional change in the font versus just a printing variation. This is definitely splitting hairs on what is a really a "variation", but since I was able to add a 1989 variation to my collection with no effort, I'm calling this one totally legit Normal on the left, bold on the right.

Very hard to see in the scans but I have seen this before. I am in the process of breaking some sets down into team sets I will have keep an eye on these.

onionring9 · May 26, 2016

banjar said:
I haven't seen mention of this variation yet...1989 Upper Deck normal vs. bold font. It's subtle but if you look closely there is definitely a difference between font thickness on both front and back. I had several of both kinds in my duplicates so I would bet it was an intentional change in the font versus just a printing variation. This is definitely splitting hairs on what is a really a "variation", but since I was able to add a 1989 variation to my collection with no effort, I'm calling this one totally legit Normal on the left, bold on the right.

Very cool I had never seen this before. I just went into my dups and confirmed that they exist for both the hologram types as well so there are four total:

-ball background normal
-ball background bold
-no ball background normal
-no ball background bold

banjar · May 26, 2016

Crap, I was afraid of that. I have the first three variations, but now I gotta go find that no ball background bolt font version

onionring9 said:
Very cool I had never seen this before. I just went into my dups and confirmed that they exist for both the hologram types as well so there are four total:

-ball background normal
-ball background bold
-no ball background normal
-no ball background bold

RStadlerASU22 · May 26, 2016

banjar said:
Crap, I was afraid of that. I have the first three variations, but now I gotta go find that no ball background bolt font version

That's the fun of collecting. Would of been boring if you already had em w/I any real searching

Ryan

RStadlerASU22 · May 27, 2016

New addition:

ImageUploadedByFreedom Card Board1464330008.650274.jpg

Front

ImageUploadedByFreedom Card Board1464330039.739521.jpg

Back

Ryan

Yanks2151 · May 27, 2016

Check out these whacky cards from my PC. Back doored at [MENTION=7453]mouschi[/MENTION] place

Jose front

Clemens back

And this O'Neill Canseco mix

ragtop12 · May 27, 2016

Neat... those Shockwave errors were actually found in packs too. I remember buying a box and every shockwave was like that. Not complaining, made good money off the errors... more than I would have made for the regular inserts! I also vaguely remember that set had wrong back errors on the reciprocals.

Be8el0ve · May 27, 2016

1996 - Pinnacle Summit - Lance Johnson with Derek Jeter name in Foil on Front

Yanks2151 · May 28, 2016

Be8el0ve said:
1996 - Pinnacle Summit - Lance Johnson with Derek Jeter name in Foil on Front

Great card. I have some Jeters to get to yet myself. Is the back all Lance Johnson?

I have a bunch of different ones like this I need to scan. I will place them here over time.

Fisk front

Back is a mis cut Guidry

BBCgalaxee · May 28, 2016

These are wrong backs

Sent from my HTCONE using Freedom Card Board mobile app

Yanks2151 · May 30, 2016

Check out the back on this one:

Hawk8 · May 30, 2016

Yanks2151 said:
Check out the back on this one:

That certainly is different!

DeliciousBacon · May 30, 2016

Yanks2151 said:
Check out the back on this one:

A few of the Collections checklists are like this:

Any checklists in the base sets that listed the inserts have no listings on back in the Collections version, since those inserts weren't part of the Collections set.

Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Official Error and Variation Discussion/Reference Thread

Active member

Well-known member

Member

Member

Active member

Active member

Well-known member

Attachments

Active member

Active member

Well-known member

Active member

Active member

Active member

New member

Active member

Active member

Well-known member

Active member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Similar threads

Log in