Prospects Lists: apples-to-apples & oranges-to-oranges?

card-treasury · Sep 29, 2008

Apples-to-Apples & Oranges-to-Oranges, or a mixed basket?

Should BA have a top pitchers list and top hitters list, or a mixed list (as is now)?

What makes more sense to you?

ThoseBackPages · Sep 29, 2008

no pitchers would be fine by me :lol:

card-treasury · Sep 29, 2008

ThoseBackPages said:
no pitchers would be fine by me :lol:

I should have added that option for you.

My bad.

:ugeek:

UMich92 · Sep 29, 2008

I vote for separate lists. I think it would be especially useful at the bottom end of prospect lists.

Alex

Bob Loblaw · Sep 30, 2008

TINSTAAPP

Of course, Cole Hamels would beg to differ.....

NerfXerks · Sep 30, 2008

I love my pitchers.

Codasco07 · Sep 30, 2008

I think the mixed list is best. If they were to do separate lists, there would be unending debate about where the players would rank on an overall list. Furthermore, when teams are doing their evaluations for drafts, they are considering all the players, not just pitchers and hitters. Assuming they consider the risk of a pitching prospect getting injured is greater, then I think the lists provide a good picture of what players are most likely to make a significant impact on the MLB level.

Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Prospects Lists: apples-to-apples & oranges-to-oranges?

Prospect List Formats

Separate Lists for pitchers and positional players.

Mixed Lists containing both.

card-treasury

New member

ThoseBackPages

New member

card-treasury

New member

UMich92

Well-known member

Bob Loblaw

Active member

NerfXerks

New member

Codasco07

Active member

Similar threads

Members online

Latest posts