- Thread starter
- #1
imac220
New member
Who would you take if you had the #1 draft pick? I would take Pujols. Maybe because I am partly biased to power. Who would you take?
Welcome to our community
Be apart of something great, join today!
Opinions: Hanley or Pujols?
- Thread starter imac220
- Start date
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
mredsox89
New member
Re: Talk: Hanley or Pujols?
Today, Hanley Ramirez. 3 years ago, Pujols.
Today, Hanley Ramirez. 3 years ago, Pujols.
blitzerlover
Active member
- Aug 9, 2008
- 6,523
- 0
Fantasy baseball?
Hanley.
Real Team:
Pujols.
Hanley.
Real Team:
Pujols.
notjomommasclint
Active member
pujols...
his bat speaks for itself but his glove will make the whole infield better... he is ******* salty!
that is only for real life... in fantasy i take pujols... because... well its my fantasy team.
his bat speaks for itself but his glove will make the whole infield better... he is ******* salty!
that is only for real life... in fantasy i take pujols... because... well its my fantasy team.
darocker80
New member
I took hanley, and happy so far lol
Pujols.
You say he's one dimensional.
.335 career batting average. 950 runs in 1243 games. 700 walks compared to 507 strikeouts. .426 on base percentage. 2867 total bases, that's more than 2 a game. 2 MVP awards (should have about 4, finished 2nd 3 times, and inexcusably finished 2 in 2006). 3 Silver Sluggers. 1 Gold Glove (should have about 4). .994 fielding percentage at 1st.
People say that the only reason he has such a good K/BB ratio, is because he gets intentionally walked so many times. Even without intentional walks, he still has more walks than strikeouts.
You say he's one dimensional.
.335 career batting average. 950 runs in 1243 games. 700 walks compared to 507 strikeouts. .426 on base percentage. 2867 total bases, that's more than 2 a game. 2 MVP awards (should have about 4, finished 2nd 3 times, and inexcusably finished 2 in 2006). 3 Silver Sluggers. 1 Gold Glove (should have about 4). .994 fielding percentage at 1st.
People say that the only reason he has such a good K/BB ratio, is because he gets intentionally walked so many times. Even without intentional walks, he still has more walks than strikeouts.
Jays_Cards
Active member
- Jan 1, 2009
- 3,845
- 0
If you are talking fantasy its EASILY Hanley. Not really even close in my opinion. If you are talking building a real team, I would actually still lean Hanley. I, for one, dont believe Pujols is the age he says he is, and SS is the most in demand position on the baseball field. Add speed, hr power, average, and what isnt there to like?
Seiya
Active member
hanram
Jays_Cards said:
Why does everyone continue to believe this? What facts do you have to prove this? Just because he's from the Dominican means he has to lie about his age to get a contract?
Pujols was not found in the ball fields of the Domican Republic.
Pujols moved to the United States when he was 16, attended high school, then college, and incredibly flew under the radar until the Cardinals drafted him in the 1999 draft.
darocker80
New member
+1Jays_Cards said:
potential 40-40 guy at shortstop! cmon!
- Thread starter
- #13
imac220
New member
ttt
matfanofold
Active member
- Aug 10, 2008
- 7,645
- 1
If I had to choose as of today?
Hanley hands down.
Hanley hands down.
trevordchi
Active member
- Aug 9, 2008
- 2,623
- 2
This isn't even close. Hanley is a young star headed towards his prime. Pujols will be on the decline sooner than later. The guy is older than you think. I'd bet my collection on it.
Ian Stewart
Active member
- Aug 7, 2008
- 2,843
- 0
Mah dudeeeeee...
mlbsalltimegreats
New member
- Aug 7, 2008
- 6,772
- 3
Pujols all the way. By the looks of the poll looks like the majority go with Pujols also 
Jays_Cards
Active member
- Jan 1, 2009
- 3,845
- 0
mlbsalltimegreats said:Pujols all the way. By the looks of the poll looks like the majority go with Pujols also
I wouldnt say that..I know Im not the only one, but if I take the time to reply, I dont vote as well..
mlbsalltimegreats
New member
- Aug 7, 2008
- 6,772
- 3
Well according to this Poll it is 70% to 29% in favor of Pujols and if that is not most then I dont know what is. I can guarantee that if espn had this same poll where 100,000+ vote it would still be in favor of Pujols by a landslide!! Hanley is good and I like the kid but he is no Pujols..Jays_Cards said:mlbsalltimegreats said:Pujols all the way. By the looks of the poll looks like the majority go with Pujols also
I wouldnt say that..I know Im not the only one, but if I take the time to reply, I dont vote as well..
Similar threads
