Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

OK, so it's before the All Star break, and Albert has 27.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

card-treasury

New member
Aug 11, 2008
1,053
0
Either he has balls the size of Yao Ming's head, or he's clean.

Can someone drum up my post where I said he's the best hitter ever, and took a bunch of flack for it last season? BTW, I love flack.
 

Jaypers

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
48,980
1,503
IL
card-treasury said:
Either he has balls the size of Yao Ming's head, or he's clean.

Can someone drum up my post where I said he's the best hitter ever, and took a bunch of flack for it last season? BTW, I love flack.


"Ever" is a powerful word, Mike.

He's certainly on his way there at light speed, but I wouldn't use that word - yet.
 

card-treasury

New member
Aug 11, 2008
1,053
0
Jaypers said:
card-treasury said:
Either he has balls the size of Yao Ming's head, or he's clean.

Can someone drum up my post where I said he's the best hitter ever, and took a bunch of flack for it last season? BTW, I love flack.


"Ever" is a powerful word, Mike.

He's certainly on his way there at light speed, but I wouldn't use that word - yet.
I know how powerful it is, and that's why I used it.
 

mlbsalltimegreats

New member
Aug 7, 2008
6,772
3
Im not sure to the answer of your post but all I know is that he fixed that bum elbow that was bothering him for years and I fully expected him to come out strong this year as this is the first time in a while he has been close to 100%. Pujols is the man :) !
 

i43770

New member
Aug 7, 2008
1,965
0
Portland, OR
Best hitter ever? If you are going by HR before the All Star break, I would still give that to Griffey (if you are going clean) or McGwire (if you don't mind a little enhancement).
 

lordsepic

Active member
Aug 9, 2008
1,099
0
Make that 28... slowey should not be pitching to a monster protected by the likes of chris duncan
 

KOBEARODLT

New member
Sep 29, 2008
4,399
0
and thats 28 and 4 more rbis....the machine is absolutely sick, i would love to see him get the triple crown this yearr
 

kdailey4315

New member
Mar 4, 2009
5,458
0
Ted Williams is the best hitter ever period, end of discussion. Until Albert flirts with 400 you can't even compare them. If Williams never served his country he would be the home rin king. Albert is the best hitter today but FAR FROM the best ever.
 

Austin

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
5,706
41
Dallas, Texas
kdailey4315 said:
If Williams never served his country he would be the home run king.
No way.
Williams only hit 40 home runs once.
He hit 30+ homers 7 times.
And 20+ homers 8 times.
Yes, He missed the equivalent of 5 seasons because of military service, but even if he somehow averaged 40 homers those missing seasons (unlikely based on his other years), he still would have been short of the record..
Ruth only had 600 more at bats than Williams, but had almost 200 more homers.
Ruth also hit 40+ homers 11 times, compared to Williams' 1.
Ruth's lifetime batting avg. was .342 compared to Williams' .344.
I don't think many fans realize what a great pure hitter Ruth was. He hit .393 one year!
Add in Ruth's pitching dominance, and Ruth is clearly the best player of all time.
I do think Pujols is the best hitter since Musial and WIlliams' era.

My top 6 is:

1. Babe Ruth
2. Ted Williams
3. Ty Cobb
4. Stan Musial
5. Lou Gehrig
6. Albert Pujols (if he keeps it up for 5+ more years)
 

kdailey4315

New member
Mar 4, 2009
5,458
0
Austin said:
kdailey4315 said:
If Williams never served his country he would be the home run king.
No way.
Williams only hit 40 home runs once.
He hit 30+ homers 7 times.
And 20+ homers 8 times.
Yes, He missed the equivalent of 5 seasons because of military service, but even if he somehow averaged 40 homers those missing seasons (unlikely based on his other years), he still would have been short of the record..
Ruth only had 600 more at bats than Williams, but had almost 200 more homers.
Ruth also hit 40+ homers 11 times, compared to Williams' 1.
Ruth's lifetime batting avg. was .342 compared to Williams' .344.
I don't think many fans realize what a great pure hitter Ruth was. He hit .393 one year!
Add in Ruth's pitching dominance, and Ruth is clearly the best player of all time.
I do think Pujols is the best hitter since Musial and WIlliams' era.

My top 6 is:

1. Babe Ruth
2. Ted Williams
3. Ty Cobb
4. Stan Musial
5. Lou Gehrig
6. Albert Pujols (if he keeps it up for 5+ more years)

No way,

Here are projected stats if Williams never missed 5 seasons. The lowest Hr total is 697. Better average, more RBI's, hits, and walks than Ruth. They both were great but Albert doesn't belong in that list yet.

http://www.seamheads.com/williams comp.htm
 

Austin

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
5,706
41
Dallas, Texas
kdailey4315 said:
Austin said:
kdailey4315 said:
If Williams never served his country he would be the home run king.
No way.
Williams only hit 40 home runs once.
He hit 30+ homers 7 times.
And 20+ homers 8 times.
Yes, He missed the equivalent of 5 seasons because of military service, but even if he somehow averaged 40 homers those missing seasons (unlikely based on his other years), he still would have been short of the record..
Ruth only had 600 more at bats than Williams, but had almost 200 more homers.
Ruth also hit 40+ homers 11 times, compared to Williams' 1.
Ruth's lifetime batting avg. was .342 compared to Williams' .344.
I don't think many fans realize what a great pure hitter Ruth was. He hit .393 one year!
Add in Ruth's pitching dominance, and Ruth is clearly the best player of all time.
I do think Pujols is the best hitter since Musial and WIlliams' era.

My top 6 is:

1. Babe Ruth
2. Ted Williams
3. Ty Cobb
4. Stan Musial
5. Lou Gehrig
6. Albert Pujols (if he keeps it up for 5+ more years)
No way,
Here are projected stats if Williams never missed 5 seasons. The lowest Hr total is 697. Better average, more RBI's, hits, and walks than Ruth. They both were great but Albert doesn't belong in that list yet.

http://www.seamheads.com/williams comp.htm
It's pointless to argue "what if?" stats.
Ruth pitched his first 5 years in the Majors.
So "what if" Ruth hit full time instead of pitching?
He'd have more than 800 homers.
Besides, those projections in the link you give of Williams each show him with more than 10,000 at bats, or 2,000 more than Ruth.
So "what if" Ruth and Williams had the same number of at bats?
Ruth would blow Williams out of the water.
 

Weatherwarrior

New member
Aug 7, 2008
1,359
0
NE Georgia
But ruth did it in the dead ball era. Williams played in a much more homer friendly park and didn't have to face the likes of a spitball. Either way williams was a great hitter but in the era of todays specialist (Pitchers) Williams wouldn't hit .400 and i don't think anyone else could either.

Cobb was the Best he could hit for average or he could hit for power if needed. If you have to talk about great hitters though how could we leave out the likes of Hornsby who hit over .400 three times!
 

Austin

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
5,706
41
Dallas, Texas
Weatherwarrior said:
If you have to talk about great hitters though how could we leave out the likes of Hornsby who hit over .400 three times!
Hornsby is defintely one of the most underrated hitters of all time.
He averaged .402 over a 5-year stretch and hit .358 lifetime, second to Ty Cobb.
And he won two Triple Crowns.
The main knock against him is he had an amazing ten years of dominance, then injuries and other problems riddled him for many years.
Shoeless Joe Jackson may be another top 10 hitter of all time.
 

lordsepic

Active member
Aug 9, 2008
1,099
0
kdailey4315 said:
Austin said:
kdailey4315 said:
If Williams never served his country he would be the home run king.
No way.
Williams only hit 40 home runs once.
He hit 30+ homers 7 times.
And 20+ homers 8 times.
Yes, He missed the equivalent of 5 seasons because of military service, but even if he somehow averaged 40 homers those missing seasons (unlikely based on his other years), he still would have been short of the record..
Ruth only had 600 more at bats than Williams, but had almost 200 more homers.
Ruth also hit 40+ homers 11 times, compared to Williams' 1.
Ruth's lifetime batting avg. was .342 compared to Williams' .344.
I don't think many fans realize what a great pure hitter Ruth was. He hit .393 one year!
Add in Ruth's pitching dominance, and Ruth is clearly the best player of all time.
I do think Pujols is the best hitter since Musial and WIlliams' era.

My top 6 is:

1. Babe Ruth
2. Ted Williams
3. Ty Cobb
4. Stan Musial
5. Lou Gehrig
6. Albert Pujols (if he keeps it up for 5+ more years)

No way,

Here are projected stats if Williams never missed 5 seasons. The lowest Hr total is 697. Better average, more RBI's, hits, and walks than Ruth. They both were great but Albert doesn't belong in that list yet.

http://www.seamheads.com/williams comp.htm

check the projections again bro...

and let's not forget Albert is a career .334 hitter...
 

George_Calfas

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2008
36,264
30
Urbana
ThoseBackPages said:
imagine if Pujols was on a real team?

Like who? Not for sure but which team in the Central is in first? 41 wins, only LA and BOS have more wins, no team in the NL East has 40 wins.

Also, how many World Series has Albert played in/won.....Real Team, WHATEVER!
 

Austin

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2008
5,706
41
Dallas, Texas
ThoseBackPages said:
imagine if Pujols was on a real team?
The Cardinals are in first place and have a better record than your Mets, plus won the World Series in 2006.
I like you, but don't be a troll.
 

ThoseBackPages

New member
Aug 7, 2008
32,986
8
New York
Not trolling at all.

in a 5-3 game in the bottom of the fourth inning with your team losing, why was he walked intentionally after hitting two home runs?

because there's no one else to fear in the lineup.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top