TwinGnats
New member
That actually may be true but you're a thief.
Spoken like the knucklehead you are...
BG
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Spoken like the knucklehead you are...
BG
TG, don't you think you should at least wait until someone actually announces what is actually going on before you denounce someone for something they might do? Or attempt to do? ::facepalm::
So why do UD, Panini and Topps not have their Reps on this or other collector forums? :lol:
TG, don't you think you should at least wait until someone actually announces what is actually going on before you denounce someone for something they might do? Or attempt to do?
I don't even understand your Last post or the point behind it...
People in this thread say Leaf is stealing something or going to steal something. What am I missing?
Conspiracy theory is so awesome. I'm wondering if you believe we landed on the moon or if it really was terrorists who brought down the towers?
I'm sure this has everything to do with it. Because that script/color scheme/etc was designed by the team and it's part of their "corporate identity". I'm not sure if they trademark those "designs" or not, but I'd be willing to bet they do.
1). I'm all for more product and options. I love the old days when you had choices between Topps, Playoff, Fleer, Upper Deck, etc. In fact, I hate exclusive licenses (I stopped collecting new hockey cards when UD won the rights to the NHL).
2). My problem is the idea of using the first amendment to try to circumvent a contract for the express reason of allowing the complaining party to make money. You want to argue anti-competitive reasons or anything else, be my guest, but the first amendment and sports cards should never be uttered in the same sentence.
After careful consideration guys, I think this is just a lot of hot air being brought up by a guy that is waiting for someone else to throw the first "stone" so to speak. Brian either doesn't have the cajones or the wallet to challenge the MLB exclusive on his own, and is apparently saying someone else will be going after them instead (and I'm sure he'll tag along on the case once it's out there). What I find sad is that Brian will go out and make a public tweet like that, yet will only discuss the matter with people privately on the phone where he could later deny anything he said on the call. He even PM'd me that if I ever wanted to know what was really going on he'd love to discuss it.
OK Brian, here is your put up or shut up moment: If you would really love to discuss what is going on, BY ALL MEANS GO AHEAD AND DISCUSS IT!!! You have your own forum here, you can respond on this 8 page post, you can start your own brand new post, you can post it all on twitter, set up a moderated Q&A here, whatever you choose. You like to throw these little comments out there, just to prove you are one of the cool kids who is "in the know", but then won't go ahead and actually discuss what you know is going on behind the scenes. Are you really that insecure that you need to go and do things like post that initial tweet, knowing full well that you'll never discuss these things you know publicly?
#golfclap
I think we have seen enough of the word "troll" thrown around.
I think we have seen enough of the word "troll" thrown around.