Hi! I'm the guy who caused a bunch of down time and installs new stuff.. AMA

[AmishDave]

Who the XXXX is piss moaning about it ? I'll call their XXXXX ass out, whoever it is, friend or foe. That's just such a ***** move by them, whomever it may be.

A trading card site, that has some of the most comprehensive collections of cards around, that these folks want to show, BUT, can't show, because some piss ant has their bloomers wedged so far up their ass that they're coughing is being a Whiny Wendy. XXXXing weak.

 

[A_Pharis]

Who the XXXX is piss moaning about it ? I'll call their XXXXX ass out, whoever it is, friend or foe. That's just such a ***** move by them, whomever it may be.

A trading card site, that has some of the most comprehensive collections of cards around, that these folks want to show, BUT, can't show, because some piss ant has their bloomers wedged so far up their ass that they're coughing is being a Whiny Wendy. XXXXing weak.

Woooaaahhhh calm down, Dave. Pull the dogs back!

 

[Hendersonfan]

Who the XXXX is piss moaning about it ? I'll call their XXXXX ass out, whoever it is, friend or foe. That's just such a ***** move by them, whomever it may be.

A trading card site, that has some of the most comprehensive collections of cards around, that these folks want to show, BUT, can't show, because some piss ant has their bloomers wedged so far up their ass that they're coughing is being a Whiny Wendy. XXXXing weak.

I confess. It was me. I was the second gunman on the grassy knoll.

This notice is required by law.

 

[AmishDave]

Woooaaahhhh calm down, Dave. Pull the dogs back!

I just get so tired of XXXXing drama and it's seemingly seeping everywhere, like the melting snow. It just runs all over. Folks need to enjoy this XXXX. If I don't see sigs, why bother. It'd be worse than the Beckett Buy / Sell / Trade from the late '90's.

 

[fordman]

I guess data in two different threads to allow sigs is now trumping the data collected earlier to turn them off?

Sigs back on for now.

Fordman

 

[moxacaine]

Someone who claims they don't visit a site because of signatures is a liar. It's just a cop out answer to hide the real issue which is usually another member or staff. I know this is the case with a few members I spoke to over the years after they had left.

 

[DaleMurphyCollector]

No sir. Different developers. The app is what it is and probably won't change without a complete rewrite

Why was an muchuckwagon post from 2009 quoted in your post?

I have never seen a message board without signatures. Just limit the size and give users the option to view or supress signatures. Pretty easy. I find it more annoying to see "This notice required by law" in what is seemingly part of the post than I find "real" graphics-based sigs.

 

[Hendersonfan]

I was told (not by Gilmore) that a signature was needed on app. If it is not required, I'll take it off.

This notice is required by law.

 

[gracecollector]

I confess. It was me. I was the second gunman on the grassy knoll.

This notice is required by law.

Save the board some bandwidth and take off the "This notice is required by law." stupid tag on all your posts.

 

[A_Pharis]

No sir. Different developers. The app is what it is and probably won't change without a complete rewrite

LOL wtf, bro? Check your quote.

 

[A_Pharis]

Why was an muchuckwagon post from 2009 quoted in your post?

I have never seen a message board without signatures. Just limit the size and give users the option to view or supress signatures. Pretty easy. I find it more annoying to see "This notice required by law" in what is seemingly part of the post than I find "real" graphics-based sigs.

Ok, Chris' quote didn't originally quote that. LOL

 

[A_Pharis]

I was told (not by Gilmore) that a signature was needed on app. If it is not required, I'll take it off.

This notice is required by law.

Most certainly not required.

 

[Hendersonfan]

Then it's off. I thought it was dumb to have one needed, that's why it said what it did. Now any post from PC (now) or phone will look the same.

 

[cgilmo]

I surveyed 20 people. 13 of them came back with the big sigs issue.


Still, I'm going to have to find a way to make it not affect the existing user base. I didn't realize so many felt so strongly about it.

 

[cgilmo]

Save the board some bandwidth and take off the "This notice is required by law." stupid tag on all your posts.

we don't have bandwidth issues

We were having CPU issues

now we are having memory issues


But not issues that cause an outage.

 

[Hendersonfan]

now we are having memory issues

Alzheimer's?

 

[A_Pharis]

I surveyed 20 people. 13 of them came back with the big sigs issue.


Still, I'm going to have to find a way to make it not affect the existing user base. I didn't realize so many felt so strongly about it.

I am honestly surprised anyone would give that as a serious answer unless they were on a mobile device. However, I think Tapatalk filters sigs, doesn't it?

 

[cgilmo]

Why was an muchuckwagon post from 2009 quoted in your post?

I have never seen a message board without signatures. Just limit the size and give users the option to view or supress signatures. Pretty easy. I find it more annoying to see "This notice required by law" in what is seemingly part of the post than I find "real" graphics-based sigs.

see your sig is massive

 

[Hendersonfan]

I don't use TapAtalk. I have it on my phone for other forums, but FCB opens in the app. If I go to the site on my phone, it asks if I want to open in app or TapAtalk. I see no signatures on phone except mobile sigs.

 

[DaleMurphyCollector]

Ok, Chris' quote didn't originally quote that. LOL

Then why/how is it quoted?