- Thread starter
- #1
ostrander111
New member
..Robby Cano has a legitmate shot at beating out hammy for the mvp?? I personally would love to see it, but i just dont know if its gonna happen. Thoughts? Comments?
Thanks
Thanks
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
ALL_THE_HYPE said:Miguel Cabrera had the best offensive season in baseball. Cano had a very nice year and also played great defense. But everyone already seems to have given the award to Hamilton, despite the fact that he missed time down the stretch and his team kept winning.
I don't necessarily agree with the choice of giving it to Hamilton simply because his team apparently didn't need him to be successful. Without Cano at the beginning of the season, where would the Yankees have been? And without Cabrera all season, the Tigers absolutely would have finished in the cellar of the AL Central. To me the MVP is the one who has the numbers, but also proves to be extremely valuable to his team. IMO, whether or not their team makes the playoffs should not matter.
blitzerlover said:ALL_THE_HYPE said:Miguel Cabrera had the best offensive season in baseball. Cano had a very nice year and also played great defense. But everyone already seems to have given the award to Hamilton, despite the fact that he missed time down the stretch and his team kept winning.
I don't necessarily agree with the choice of giving it to Hamilton simply because his team apparently didn't need him to be successful. Without Cano at the beginning of the season, where would the Yankees have been? And without Cabrera all season, the Tigers absolutely would have finished in the cellar of the AL Central. To me the MVP is the one who has the numbers, but also proves to be extremely valuable to his team. IMO, whether or not their team makes the playoffs should not matter.
I don't think its fair to punish or reward a guy for what his team did without him
ALL_THE_HYPE said:blitzerlover said:[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":1gns5mki]Miguel Cabrera had the best offensive season in baseball. Cano had a very nice year and also played great defense. But everyone already seems to have given the award to Hamilton, despite the fact that he missed time down the stretch and his team kept winning.
I don't necessarily agree with the choice of giving it to Hamilton simply because his team apparently didn't need him to be successful. Without Cano at the beginning of the season, where would the Yankees have been? And without Cabrera all season, the Tigers absolutely would have finished in the cellar of the AL Central. To me the MVP is the one who has the numbers, but also proves to be extremely valuable to his team. IMO, whether or not their team makes the playoffs should not matter.
I don't think its fair to punish or reward a guy for what his team did without him
blitzerlover said:ALL_THE_HYPE said:blitzerlover said:[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":fxdbmvz0]Miguel Cabrera had the best offensive season in baseball. Cano had a very nice year and also played great defense. But everyone already seems to have given the award to Hamilton, despite the fact that he missed time down the stretch and his team kept winning.
I don't necessarily agree with the choice of giving it to Hamilton simply because his team apparently didn't need him to be successful. Without Cano at the beginning of the season, where would the Yankees have been? And without Cabrera all season, the Tigers absolutely would have finished in the cellar of the AL Central. To me the MVP is the one who has the numbers, but also proves to be extremely valuable to his team. IMO, whether or not their team makes the playoffs should not matter.
I don't think its fair to punish or reward a guy for what his team did without him
If this is so, then I don't think you can include team performance as a factor at all.
How can you give a guy more 'points' for this award because of his team winning, but then not penalize him if his team still wins without him? Seems like if he was truly that valuable to his team, his team would not have been as successful without him in the lineup.
I don't think it's fair to have it both ways- you either use team performance, whether it helps or hurts a player's MVP chances, or you don't use team performance as a factor at all.
I don't like the way this award seems to be centered around team success. Sure, winning is valuable, but winning is not because of a single player. And when that player is out of the lineup and the team still wins, doesn't that prove that he is NOT as valuable to his team as we may have thought? I think so.
ALL_THE_HYPE said:blitzerlover said:[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":31pwfzbm]blitzerlover said:[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":31pwfzbm]Miguel Cabrera had the best offensive season in baseball. Cano had a very nice year and also played great defense. But everyone already seems to have given the award to Hamilton, despite the fact that he missed time down the stretch and his team kept winning.
I don't necessarily agree with the choice of giving it to Hamilton simply because his team apparently didn't need him to be successful. Without Cano at the beginning of the season, where would the Yankees have been? And without Cabrera all season, the Tigers absolutely would have finished in the cellar of the AL Central. To me the MVP is the one who has the numbers, but also proves to be extremely valuable to his team. IMO, whether or not their team makes the playoffs should not matter.
I don't think its fair to punish or reward a guy for what his team did without him
If this is so, then I don't think you can include team performance as a factor at all.
How can you give a guy more 'points' for this award because of his team winning, but then not penalize him if his team still wins without him? Seems like if he was truly that valuable to his team, his team would not have been as successful without him in the lineup.
I don't think it's fair to have it both ways- you either use team performance, whether it helps or hurts a player's MVP chances, or you don't use team performance as a factor at all.
I don't like the way this award seems to be centered around team success. Sure, winning is valuable, but winning is not because of a single player. And when that player is out of the lineup and the team still wins, doesn't that prove that he is NOT as valuable to his team as we may have thought? I think so.
vwnut13 said:Are you the Most Valuable Player if your team wins without you in September or are you more Valuable if you carry your team for the first two months of the season?