Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

1994 Upper Deck Electric Diamond

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

spikes

New member
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
This is the copy I own not sure which it is or what the difference is.http://s134.photobucket.com/user/we...543TrotNixon_zps3640b936.jpg.html?sort=9&o=31



Here is the difference, hope this helps

1422747249496.jpg

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Freedom Card Board mobile app
 

weegee

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2008
Messages
732
Reaction score
17
Location
Maine
Here is the difference, hope this helps

View attachment 45817

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Freedom Card Board mobile app
That helps alot thank you . Only problem I have now is the card number Beckett has listed goes to the link I provided and the back is not the same set up. But my 1994 upper deck minors #4 does have the same back as your photo
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
597
Reaction score
8
That helps alot thank you . Only problem I have now is the card number Beckett has listed goes to the link I provided and the back is not the same set up. But my 1994 upper deck minors #4 does have the same back as your photo

More misinformation from Beckett.

The Trot Nixon and all other series 2 cards, all subset cards in series 1 and 2, DO NOT have a silver back variation. In fact, only about 45 series 1 cards are affected by it.
 

MansGame

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
15,336
Reaction score
37
Location
Dallas, TX
I need the Albert Belle. Anyone help here? I have like 20 copies of the other one...
 

Hawk8

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
8,415
Reaction score
290
Location
Louisiana
Thought I had the Dawson, but I was wrong, will have to look through my extras the next time I am home.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
597
Reaction score
8
I need the Albert Belle. Anyone help here? I have like 20 copies of the other one...

There is NO Albert Belle in this partial parallel set despite what Beckett is stating:

58 Kevin Mitchell
59 Raul Mondesi
60 Rickey Henderson
68 John Roper
71 Mo Vaughn
73 Dave Magadan
75 Archi Cianfracco
81 Dave Winfield
83 Andy Van Slyke
84 Kevin Stocker
86 Bernie Williams
89 Dave Stewart
92 Ryne Sandberg
93 Chris Gomez
97 Wil Cordero
99 John Olerud
100 Kirt Manwaring
102 Mike Mussina
103 Nigel Wilson
105 Roberto Mejia
113 Tripp Cromer
120 Bobby Witt
123 Danny Darwin
124 Eduardo Perez
137 Devon White
141 Rick Aguilera
151 Bret Barberie
157 Jim Eisenreich
160 Ryan Thompson
166 Kevin Gross
171 Kirk Rueter
174 Mike Bordick
184 Milt Thompson
187 Mike Greenwell
195 Todd Van Poppel
224 Ken Griffey
225 Fred McGriff
237 Rondell White
238 Jeff King
239 Luis Alicea
246 Dave Fleming
250 Curtis Pride
259 Jimy Key
261 Eric Davis
266 Cory Snyder
 

RStadlerASU22

Active member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
8,883
Reaction score
16
There is NO Albert Belle in this partial parallel set despite what Beckett is stating:

58 Kevin Mitchell
59 Raul Mondesi
60 Rickey Henderson
68 John Roper
71 Mo Vaughn
73 Dave Magadan
75 Archi Cianfracco
81 Dave Winfield
83 Andy Van Slyke
84 Kevin Stocker
86 Bernie Williams
89 Dave Stewart
92 Ryne Sandberg
93 Chris Gomez
97 Wil Cordero
99 John Olerud
100 Kirt Manwaring
102 Mike Mussina
103 Nigel Wilson
105 Roberto Mejia
113 Tripp Cromer
120 Bobby Witt
123 Danny Darwin
124 Eduardo Perez
137 Devon White
141 Rick Aguilera
151 Bret Barberie
157 Jim Eisenreich
160 Ryan Thompson
166 Kevin Gross
171 Kirk Rueter
174 Mike Bordick
184 Milt Thompson
187 Mike Greenwell
195 Todd Van Poppel
224 Ken Griffey
225 Fred McGriff
237 Rondell White
238 Jeff King
239 Luis Alicea
246 Dave Fleming
250 Curtis Pride
259 Jimy Key
261 Eric Davis
266 Cory Snyder

Do you know why those numbers have them ? Certain sheet it what ? Any chance other have them but no confirmation.

Thx
Ryan
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
597
Reaction score
8
I'm not sure why these numbers but I would wager it has to do with sheet placement. The list has been known and passed around among e&v collectors for a decade or longer as far as I know. All my findings of these cards back in 1994, my findings since then and the folks I know with "complete sets" of them all match this list. Same applies to the base cards with silver backs.
 

RStadlerASU22

Active member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
8,883
Reaction score
16
I'm not sure why these numbers but I would wager it has to do with sheet placement. The list has been known and passed around among e&v collectors for a decade or longer as far as I know. All my findings of these cards back in 1994, my findings since then and the folks I know with "complete sets" of them all match this list. Same applies to the base cards with silver backs.

Ok , thanks . So your saying base cards w silver backs is the same list ?

Thx
Ryan
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
597
Reaction score
8
Ok , thanks . So your saying base cards w silver backs is the same list ?

Thx
Ryan

Yes, as far as my sources go. I've yet to see a copy of a base with silver back that is not counted on that list. Keep in mind that far fewer base/silver backs exist than the electric/silver backs. I only know of a couple e&v collectors with complete (or close) sets of the base. They were obviously caught and changed over before the ED versions.
 

gpenko826

New member
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Messages
252
Reaction score
0
I have the Ken Griffey Jr. base card with a silver back... Picked it up as part of a lot.
 

RStadlerASU22

Active member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
8,883
Reaction score
16
Yes, as far as my sources go. I've yet to see a copy of a base with silver back that is not counted on that list. Keep in mind that far fewer base/silver backs exist than the electric/silver backs. I only know of a couple e&v collectors with complete (or close) sets of the base. They were obviously caught and changed over before the ED versions.

Gracias sir

Ryan
 

mrmopar

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
7,329
Reaction score
7,411
Aside from the normal chipping you see on the ED versions, there is no different between the ED and base backs for the silver parallels. In the Thompson photo, the EDs are on the left and the regular base are on the right.



Does any one have a scan of the difference from the electric diamond and electric diamond silver back? The Trot Nixon was added recently.
 

Attachments

  • 94 UD Back Variations ED & Base.jpg
    94 UD Back Variations ED & Base.jpg
    312.7 KB · Views: 81
  • 94 UD Back Variations.jpg
    94 UD Back Variations.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 86
  • 94 UD Back Variations Gwynn.jpg
    94 UD Back Variations Gwynn.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 81

PeteD

Active member
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
2,175
Reaction score
17
Location
Southern Ont.
First i heard of these, have 33 of the ED. List below...lmk if you need any.

58 Kevin Mitchell
71 Mo Vaughn
73 Dave Magadan
75 Archi Cianfracco
81 Dave Winfield
83 Andy Van Slyke
84 Kevin Stocker
86 Bernie Williams
89 Dave Stewart
93 Chris Gomez
99 John Olerud
100 Kirt Manwaring
102 Mike Mussina
103 Nigel Wilson
105 Roberto Mejia
113 Tripp Cromer
120 Bobby Witt
137 Devon White
141 Rick Aguilera
151 Bret Barberie
157 Jim Eisenreich
166 Kevin Gross
171 Kirk Rueter
174 Mike Bordick
195 Todd Van Poppel
225 Fred McGriff
237 Rondell White
238 Jeff King
239 Luis Alicea
246 Dave Fleming
259 Jimy Key
261 Eric Davis
266 Cory Snyder
 

MansGame

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
15,336
Reaction score
37
Location
Dallas, TX
I need to get Beckett to remove Belle from this checklist. Everywhere I look it shows he isn't included.
 

MansGame

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
15,336
Reaction score
37
Location
Dallas, TX
Yes, he is absolutely not part of this partial parallel set. Once again, Beckett is wrong about these cards.

My contact at Beckett is either not there anymore or dead or both. I need to figure out a new contact to help me with my checklist LOL
 

Members online

Top