That's Crucial
New member
- May 11, 2011
- 367
- 0
you say thats a pro but if they are ever worth a shiite as prospects theyll have autos making the base chromes worthless. unless you are stras or harper base CL cards are worthless.
Jaypers said:Ok, here are my thoughts, all told.
Pros
1) The base prospect set looks MUCH better than 2011 Bowman's. Includes the first ever cards of Jiwan James and Carlos Martinez, as well as the first Topps cards of Skaggs, Castellanos, Ranaudo and Marisnick.
2) The on-card autograph checklist looks very good overall. Includes Hicks' and Lyles' first Topps auto, as well as Ranaudo and international prospect Luis Heredia. McNutt will do well. Lawrie and Turner will do even better. (Why exactly are these out of numerical sequence on the sheet, though?)
3) Prospect base refractors #d to 500? Works for me.
4) USA 18U redemption packs. I like this concept, but I hope Topps doesn't take long to redeem them.
5) Not a fan of inserts, but I like the 2001 BC 10th Anniversary throwback cards.
Cons
1) I'll say it again - WHEN is Hosmer going to get a Topps auto? They included Lyles, Lawrie and Hicks as autos (all were Razor guys), so why not him????
2) Is this 2005 BCDP? Why do we need a second 1/1, especially when it wasn't in 2011 Bowman? NOT a fan of the Canary Diamonds.
3) Repetition in the prospect base set - Banuelos, Morrison and Arcia already had them in Bowman, just to name three. Boooooo.
4) I don't mind bringing back Bowman's Best, but ANOTHER Harper? C'mon, you guys can find more than just him.
5) I thought I was looking at 2011 Bowman at first when I saw the Green MLB Rookie CL - more repetition here, too.
6) Micro-Fractors? Fusion-fractors? Future-fractors? PLEASE. I'd like to find the guy who came up with this premise and knee him in the jewels.
Overall though, I'd say this is better than Bowman.
I'd give it a solid B+.