- Thread starter
- #1
http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/9972634/max-scherzer-detroit-tigers-wins-2013-al-cy-young-award
Not unexpected on either side, but glad it's official.
Not unexpected on either side, but glad it's official.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Kershaw wasn't any more deserving than Wainwright.
Would love to hear this argument...
How was he?
ERA over a run lower. More K's, lower WHIP. Pretty much beat him in every meaningful stat... Feel free to argue the other side.
I hope this is a joke post, because you're smarter than this Sam.The coast bias sickens me.
If Wainwright pitched on the East or West coast, he would have at least 3 Cy Young awards.
I agree with the existance of a coast-bias, but did you notice that Kershaw had a 1.83 ERA? Say what? That's historically great. He was absolutely more deserving that Wainwright.Kershaw wasn't any more deserving than Wainwright.
ERA over a run lower. More K's, lower WHIP. Pretty much beat him in every meaningful stat... Feel free to argue the other side.
Yup. Some people (not just Sam) have their team blinders on just a tad too tight sometimes. I can't say I haven't been guilty of it myself.But he didn't play for the Cardinals - therefore - didn't deserve it.![]()
100% agree. Obviously I feel Kershaw was more than deserving (again, team blinders might be a factor), as did 29/30 of the writers that voted for him. This year he was the clear choice. However, Wainwright had a fantastic year - no way should he have placed that low on some ballots.Kershaw deserved every first place vote. But how did four writers leave Wainwright out of the top 5? That's ridiculous.