- Thread starter
- #1
mouschi
Featured Contributor, Bridging the Gap, Senior Mem
- May 18, 2012
- 3,105
- 170
Here are mine:
- 2015 was cool.
- Creating a nearly identical product 9 months later, with the same players is not. Not at all. Ok, so the foil stamp is gold now, the case sticker is on the other side of the holder, but ... c'mon.
- It is a shame for those of us who paid good money for a card that was numbered out of /2 /3 /4 or /5 only to find the exact same card is now numbered to /25 & /50.
- They need to derail the buyback train...asap. In 9 months, some cards have had nearly 10 different versions of a buyback. From '15 archives to '15 originals to '16 65th and now '16 archives.
- The LEAST they could do is give us a checklist.
Sorry for the rant - what are your thoughts?
- 2015 was cool.
- Creating a nearly identical product 9 months later, with the same players is not. Not at all. Ok, so the foil stamp is gold now, the case sticker is on the other side of the holder, but ... c'mon.
- It is a shame for those of us who paid good money for a card that was numbered out of /2 /3 /4 or /5 only to find the exact same card is now numbered to /25 & /50.
- They need to derail the buyback train...asap. In 9 months, some cards have had nearly 10 different versions of a buyback. From '15 archives to '15 originals to '16 65th and now '16 archives.
- The LEAST they could do is give us a checklist.
Sorry for the rant - what are your thoughts?
Last edited: