- Thread starter
- #1
Topnotchsy
Featured Contributor, The best players in history?
- Aug 7, 2008
- 9,475
- 253
I've spoken to a number of people on these boards and posted a couple of times about looking for "alternative investments," investments in cards that are not RC's. I've had some discussion with a couple of people and wanted to share my latest attempt.
When the 2008 Ultimate Collection Bat Barrel Autographs came out, I felt that the prices were significantly lower than they "should" be, based on how unusual the concept was (there have been almost no bat cards that size in all the years of game-used, and even fewer were signed.) I went and snagged the Jeter for $101 delivered, and went on to pick up a few more.
Yesterday I listed the Jeter with a BIN of $160 which was hit, which made a pretty sweet 3 week "flip" especially considering I paid market value at the time of the purchase.
Basically I think it's clear that there are ways to make money in all areas of the card market if one pays close enough attention. For the Ultimate set I've been picking up some of the rarer ones (and especially the retired players) and still think those could still see some serious increases (how crazy is a Musial Bat Barrel Auto /10!!) though some of the cards are selling fairly well.
It's all about keeping your eyes open, and allowing yourself to think differently than the masses. IMO there was no "magic," it was simply looking at the factors:
1. The concept of the card is highly unusual (this means that it should end up standing out amongst the rest.)
2. The card design (IMO anyway) is awesome (ugly cards just don't do too well.)
3. The set was released at the same time as Prime Cuts and Sterling (this told me that the set could very well be under-priced since many may not have noticed the set.)
4. Ultimate Collection was released with little "fanfare" and the fact that these were Game-Used seemed to have been overlooked. (I asked around at the beginning and many people were unaware that the set was game-used. I figured that because there were so many "letterman" sets recently, people are used to cards that have "material" in them not being game-used.)
Combining these ideas there was plenty of reason to believe the set would be popular, and also reason to believe that the set was being overlooked (if only one of these was true, there would be no reason for real increases.)
Anyone else invest in non-RC sets? Any thoughts?
And for those who care, full disclosure I have the Sandberg /15, Schmidt /15 and Musial /10 so my opinion may be slightly biased on this set, but I do put my money where my mouth is.
When the 2008 Ultimate Collection Bat Barrel Autographs came out, I felt that the prices were significantly lower than they "should" be, based on how unusual the concept was (there have been almost no bat cards that size in all the years of game-used, and even fewer were signed.) I went and snagged the Jeter for $101 delivered, and went on to pick up a few more.
Yesterday I listed the Jeter with a BIN of $160 which was hit, which made a pretty sweet 3 week "flip" especially considering I paid market value at the time of the purchase.
Basically I think it's clear that there are ways to make money in all areas of the card market if one pays close enough attention. For the Ultimate set I've been picking up some of the rarer ones (and especially the retired players) and still think those could still see some serious increases (how crazy is a Musial Bat Barrel Auto /10!!) though some of the cards are selling fairly well.
It's all about keeping your eyes open, and allowing yourself to think differently than the masses. IMO there was no "magic," it was simply looking at the factors:
1. The concept of the card is highly unusual (this means that it should end up standing out amongst the rest.)
2. The card design (IMO anyway) is awesome (ugly cards just don't do too well.)
3. The set was released at the same time as Prime Cuts and Sterling (this told me that the set could very well be under-priced since many may not have noticed the set.)
4. Ultimate Collection was released with little "fanfare" and the fact that these were Game-Used seemed to have been overlooked. (I asked around at the beginning and many people were unaware that the set was game-used. I figured that because there were so many "letterman" sets recently, people are used to cards that have "material" in them not being game-used.)
Combining these ideas there was plenty of reason to believe the set would be popular, and also reason to believe that the set was being overlooked (if only one of these was true, there would be no reason for real increases.)
Anyone else invest in non-RC sets? Any thoughts?
And for those who care, full disclosure I have the Sandberg /15, Schmidt /15 and Musial /10 so my opinion may be slightly biased on this set, but I do put my money where my mouth is.