Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

As long as I live......

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

braden

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,536
Reaction score
0
.....I'll never fully understand balk rules.
 

boomo

Active member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
4,298
Reaction score
2
ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.
 

TheLuTimebombs

New member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
boomo said:
ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.

It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.
 

CubsFan13

New member
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
1,510
Reaction score
0
TheLuTimebombs said:
boomo said:
ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.

It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.

This. A skilled bunter could have a twenty five pitch at-bat without this rule.
 

Roberto_Clemente_21

New member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
389
Reaction score
0
Location
412
Yes a balk is very hard to understand, let alone explain. I still don't understand how a player can fake like he is pitching and turn to third then turn to first and it not be a balk.
 

wolfmanalfredo

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
8,606
Reaction score
5
Location
Minnesota
Roberto_Clemente_21 said:
Yes a balk is very hard to understand, let alone explain. I still don't understand how a player can fake like he is pitching and turn to third then turn to first and it not be a balk.


Agree.


On a side note, largest sig ever? Crop it down?
 

saferseas

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Messages
424
Reaction score
0
Location
Portland, OR
I think most balks that are called are usually when a pitcher moves and then stops....even if it's just a twitch. Whatever you're doing, you can't stop once you go into your windup routine or pickoff. I could be wrong.
 

Lancemountain

Active member
Joined
Apr 11, 2009
Messages
8,316
Reaction score
10
Location
Philadelphia
CubsFan13 said:
TheLuTimebombs said:
boomo said:
ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.

It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.

This. A skilled bunter could have a twenty five pitch at-bat without this rule.

I thought this was a pretty obvious rule to understand.

So now, at 46, you know.
 

gt2590

Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
40,267
Reaction score
5,268
Location
Near Philly
Roberto_Clemente_21 said:
Yes a balk is very hard to understand, let alone explain. I still don't understand how a player can fake like he is pitching and turn to third then turn to first and it not be a balk.

It IS a balk IF he doesn't step off the rubber...

and yeah, kill that Sig please. It actually isn't good for the Site's health to have Big Sigs and it's really tough on guys using their mobile devices
 

hofautos

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
6,678
Reaction score
0
boomo said:
ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.

it's very easy to bunt a ball foul on purpose...a couple batters could do this and drive a pitchers pitch count up where he can't pitch anymore.
 

boomo

Active member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
4,298
Reaction score
2
CubsFan13 said:
TheLuTimebombs said:
boomo said:
ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.

It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.

This. A skilled bunter could have a twenty five pitch at-bat without this rule.

so? plenty of guys get 10-12 pitch at bats fouling pitches off.
so is this a delay of game kind of thing? and i just dont believe
anyone can intentionally bunt 25 pitches off foul in a row.
 

PeteD

Active member
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
2,175
Reaction score
17
Location
Southern Ont.
TheLuTimebombs said:
boomo said:
ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.

It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.

One story I heard is Ty Cobb was pissed at a team, so he kept fouling balls into their dugout.

Some could have been attempted bunts.
 

james1991

New member
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
PeteD said:
One story I heard is Ty Cobb was pissed at a team, so he kept fouling balls into their dugout.

This is one of the most amazing things I've ever heard! haha
 

elmalo

New member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
5,216
Reaction score
0
Roberto_Clemente_21 said:
Yes a balk is very hard to understand, let alone explain. I still don't understand how a player can fake like he is pitching and turn to third then turn to first and it not be a balk.
The pitcher cant fake like he is pitching. And as long as your stepping toward the bag you dont have to throw.
 

All The Hype

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
10,250
Reaction score
0
Location
Indianapolis
boomo said:
CubsFan13 said:
TheLuTimebombs said:
boomo said:
ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.

It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.

This. A skilled bunter could have a twenty five pitch at-bat without this rule.

so? plenty of guys get 10-12 pitch at bats fouling pitches off.
so is this a delay of game kind of thing? and i just dont believe
anyone can intentionally bunt 25 pitches off foul in a row.

Taking a full swing and fouling a ball off is much more difficult to do repeatedly than to bunt foul, which is simply to put the bat where the ball is pitched in a far more controlled way.

Sure, not everyone can bunt 25 balls foul in a row, but I'm sure far more players could do that than could foul of 25 pitches in a row by taking a full swing.
 

Todd44

New member
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
334
Reaction score
0
boomo said:
CubsFan13 said:
TheLuTimebombs said:
boomo said:
ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.

It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.

This. A skilled bunter could have a twenty five pitch at-bat without this rule.

so? plenty of guys get 10-12 pitch at bats fouling pitches off.
so is this a delay of game kind of thing? and i just dont believe
anyone can intentionally bunt 25 pitches off foul in a row.

Some players definitely can bunt 25 pitches off in a row, but the more practical application of the rule is to prevent a player from virtually guaranteeing himself a walk by foul-bunting pitches that are strikes and pulling the bat back on balls. It probably wouldn't take 25 pitches to get to four balls...

But whether or not you like it or agree with it or believe it could actually happen, that is the reason the rule is in place!
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Top