- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
boomo said:ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.
TheLuTimebombs said:boomo said:ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.
It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.
Roberto_Clemente_21 said:Yes a balk is very hard to understand, let alone explain. I still don't understand how a player can fake like he is pitching and turn to third then turn to first and it not be a balk.
CubsFan13 said:TheLuTimebombs said:boomo said:ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.
It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.
This. A skilled bunter could have a twenty five pitch at-bat without this rule.
Roberto_Clemente_21 said:Yes a balk is very hard to understand, let alone explain. I still don't understand how a player can fake like he is pitching and turn to third then turn to first and it not be a balk.
boomo said:ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.
CubsFan13 said:TheLuTimebombs said:boomo said:ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.
It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.
This. A skilled bunter could have a twenty five pitch at-bat without this rule.
TheLuTimebombs said:boomo said:ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.
It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.
PeteD said:One story I heard is Ty Cobb was pissed at a team, so he kept fouling balls into their dugout.
The pitcher cant fake like he is pitching. And as long as your stepping toward the bag you dont have to throw.Roberto_Clemente_21 said:Yes a balk is very hard to understand, let alone explain. I still don't understand how a player can fake like he is pitching and turn to third then turn to first and it not be a balk.
boomo said:CubsFan13 said:TheLuTimebombs said:boomo said:ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.
It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.
This. A skilled bunter could have a twenty five pitch at-bat without this rule.
so? plenty of guys get 10-12 pitch at bats fouling pitches off.
so is this a delay of game kind of thing? and i just dont believe
anyone can intentionally bunt 25 pitches off foul in a row.
boomo said:CubsFan13 said:TheLuTimebombs said:boomo said:ill never understand why a bunted foul with 2 strikes is an out.
at 46, no one has been able to explain it other than its just the rules.
It's because back in the day players were skilled in bunting pitches away that they didn't like. So they started ruling it strike three.
This. A skilled bunter could have a twenty five pitch at-bat without this rule.
so? plenty of guys get 10-12 pitch at bats fouling pitches off.
so is this a delay of game kind of thing? and i just dont believe
anyone can intentionally bunt 25 pitches off foul in a row.