JoshHamilton said:Mozzie22 said:docdw25 said:Mozzie22 said:In my opinion for an autograph to be one of the best it has to be legible out of context. Here is what I mean by that. Some of the "best" autographs presented in this thread are artistic and flow well but if they weren't on a baseball or baseball related item nobody would know who the hell they were. Look at the McGwire or Olerud examples listed. If you had those autographs on an index card and showed them to a sixth grade class nobody would be able to decipher who the hell they are, period. Look at Ruth, Williams, Mantle, etc... You could read their names on anything and know who signed it. The players are just lazy now and somehow got it into their heads that sloppy is the "in" thing. And before anyone says, "Well, the new players have to sign more," blah, blah, blah, know that there isn't an active player alive that has signed 1/10th the amount of autographs that any of the above players listed signed, and that includes the ridiculous sticker sheets they go thru.
I've never understood why anyone would want an autograph that they have to explain to people who it is because it looks like it was signed by a chimp.
You can't understand someone collecting their favorite player? Good thing all my autos are on cards that have pictures and the player's name so I don't have to take the time to explain who signed the card.
I can understand wanting to collect your favorite player. What I can't understand is why that player doesn't take the time to sign legibly. McGwire has been one of my favorite players since the 49 he put up in 1987 but the nicest thing I can say about his autograph is that it "flows well." Let me ask you, if you had his auto on an index card and asked a non baseball fan to print the name on the card how close to you think they would get? M-----? That being said, McGwire's autograph is still more legible than some of the kids coming up but that isn't saying much.
Ideally, I prefer
1. Legible and artistic (Andre Dawson)
2. Illegible and artistic (Bannister)
3. Legible and unartistic (Angel Villalona)
4. Illegible and unartistic (Maddux)
The illegible and artistic has to be my favorite. I strongly disagree an autograph has to be legible to be one of the "best". An autograph or signature should be a representation of the person who is signing. Not everybody will be as neat and orderly as many of the past players are and frankly, I find some of those autographs boring. That's not to say that I don't like autographs that are legible, but an autograph should not be a player's neatest work of cursive. My favorite autograph of all time has to be jay buhner's as it's truly a work of art and very eye appealing.