Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Better career (projected) - Trout vs Lawrie

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Titans74

New member
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Messages
694
Reaction score
0
1st Sunday off in a few months. Looking to have a little speculation fun. :)


Who should have the better career?

What sort of numbers should each project to put up? Either yearly or career.

What players do Trout and Lawrie compare to?
 

Wes

OG
Administrator
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
10,993
Reaction score
0
Location
SF Bay Area, California, United States
I'll take Trout. I think he'll be what people wanted Grady Sizemore to be. .300, 30 HR, 30 SB type guy. The defensive value puts him ahead of Lawrie, who I could see becoming a poor man's Ryan Braun.
 

Joshua.Roundtree

New member
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Messages
2,490
Reaction score
0
Location
Clearwater, FL
Wes said:
I'll take Trout. I think he'll be what people wanted Grady Sizemore to be. .300, 30 HR, 30 SB type guy. The defensive value puts him ahead of Lawrie, who I could see becoming a poor man's Ryan Braun.

Lawrie has played a stellar 3B for Toronto and has an absolute cannon for an arm. Not saying I'd take him over Trout, but he'll be an infielder, unlike Braun who was a disaster at 3B.
 

Brett Keith

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,634
Reaction score
0
Location
Peoria, IL
I think Ellsbury this year is giving a glimpse of what Trout could become, though I'd expect more BB's from Trout. As for Lawrie, the Braun comp is probably pretty apt, though I don't know if it needs to be prefaced with "poor man's".
 

Jaypers

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
49,783
Reaction score
2,774
Location
IL
Big price spike for Trout. Last one of these sold for $230 three days ago.

[ebay:l116b7zx]120768901219[/ebay:l116b7zx]
 

zookerman182

New member
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
0
Location
Huntsville, AL
I like Lawrie.....i wish he was in more than razor......and i wish i still had all of these.

I wasnt expecting his fast start, and the person ive heard him most compared to is Utley.


P4010005.jpg
 

mwashuc06

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,453
Reaction score
1
Brett Keith said:
I think Ellsbury this year is giving a glimpse of what Trout could become, though I'd expect more BB's from Trout. As for Lawrie, the Braun comp is probably pretty apt, though I don't know if it needs to be prefaced with "poor man's".

I think Ellsbury's season this year is what Trout could average.
 

shayscards79

New member
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
3,166
Reaction score
0
Location
Chicago
zookerman182 said:
I like Lawrie.....i wish he was in more than razor......and i wish i still had all of these.

I wasnt expecting his fast start, and the person ive heard him most compared to is Utley.

He'll be in chrome, but I'm sure they won't be at a bargain any time soon.
 

Lars

Active member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
1,269
Reaction score
0
Looking at Lawrie - does he have the body type to stick in the infield through his prime? This isn't saying he won't be an all-star but can he stay at third or will he have to be moved to a corner outfield position or first base?

Mike Trout - he could be a .300, 30, 100, 50 SB, .400 on-base, .500 slugging guy in his prime - basically your prototypical superstar talent if he's healthy.
 

Titans74

New member
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Messages
694
Reaction score
0
Great discussion and comments everyone.
 

scotty21690

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
16,150
Reaction score
0
PujolsCollector said:
I will take Lowrie on this one. That dude is incredible
Sure as hell can't beat a switch hitting infielder who can play all IF positions!


bdd_jl_tor_8-24-08_reu.jpg
 

scotty21690

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
16,150
Reaction score
0
Wow Lawrie hauls ass! Just beat out a double play and stole second, didn't realize he could run that good! That solidifies my Lawrie pick :) (Even if it was against my Red Sox :evil: )
 

Keyser Soze

New member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
3,262
Reaction score
0
Location
The Woodlands, TX
I don't mean this to be disrespectful to anyone, but I pick Trout, and think that in 5 or 6 years it will be laughable that some chose Lawrie over him
 

scotty21690

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
16,150
Reaction score
0
Keyser Soze said:
I don't mean this to be disrespectful to anyone, but I pick Trout, and think that in 5 or 6 years it will be laughable that some chose Lawrie over him
I think it's laughable that you can predict the future.
 

mwashuc06

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,453
Reaction score
1
Lars said:
Looking at Lawrie - does he have the body type to stick in the infield through his prime? This isn't saying he won't be an all-star but can he stay at third or will he have to be moved to a corner outfield position or first base?

Mike Trout - he could be a .300, 30, 100, 50 SB, .400 on-base, .500 slugging guy in his prime - basically your prototypical superstar talent if he's healthy.

If Trout does that, he's a HOFer in the Mays and Mantle class.
 

shayscards79

New member
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
3,166
Reaction score
0
Location
Chicago
Debate this all you want.

But the real question here is:

Do you really lose having either one of them?
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top