Bleacher Report does Top 120 helmets in CFB

[Ryo1549]

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/6196 ... ll-helmets

Texas Tech is 66th. Turrible!

 

[Card Magnet]

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/619642-love-the-lid-power-ranking-all-120-college-football-helmets

Texas Tech is 66th. Turrible!

They ranked Pitt at 93 because their helmets are "boring" and don't use a panther. I happen to think Pitt has a nice helmet; it looks classy and has a collegiate feel to it. Don't tell Tim I said that.

If it weren't for them ranking Miami at no 6, I'd call the list laughable and worthless, but I call it a very accurate and solid ranking.

 

[RITM]

THE Ohio State gets the top spot not because of the helmet but the stickers on the helmet.

 

[Brad]

All you need is an email account to write on Bleacher Report. I just disregard the site.

 

[pigskincardboard]

I thought it was a pretty good list.

The best helmets are all simple

Ohio State, Alabama, Penn State, Texas, OU and ND obviously.

The only team with logos that I actually like are the Razorbacks and Texas.

I think Alabama is number one, though.

 

[Shi Guy]

I wasn't a fan. Seemed like he had an obvious affection for "cool" logos, and rarely appreciated a simple, modest design.

 

[t3dudek]

Michigan #4 - I'll Take it
WMU #20 - Suprised by that ranking

But WTF OSU #1 because they have cool decals on the helmet. i like georgia's dog bones better then the OSU's stickers.

 

[DRav87]

Wisconsin at #77? :lol:

I also love some of the "Top 3" players he choose for some schools.

 

[sdsportsfan1214]

Bad List but interesting. thanks for the post!

 

[Junior Griffey]

Michigan's colors are not "navy and yellow".

 

[alabamalongsnake]

Agreed it was way out of whack in terms of rankings. Yes Wisconsin should have been in top 40.

Florida State should have been higher.

Some of the directional schools were way too high.

 

[AUTaxMan]

Anything ever printed on the Bleacher Report is nothing more than some random internet wannabe sports writer's opinion. I don't understand why anyone reads it or lends it any credibility.