sportscardtheory
Active member
HPC said:sportscardtheory said:I think at this point, Parra is a better option than Co-Jack. Younger, healthier and just more productive.
I wouldnt necessarily say that.
Jacksons season was a bust because he was sick for 75% of it.
Before that, he put up solid offensive numbers.
He hits .300 almost every season with around 15hr and 80rbi.
While Parra may be younger, he isnt at the level of productiveness that Jackson is. Give him more time, and I think he can be close.
I think Parra needs to play a full season as a starter to get a real gauge on what he can do. After only one season, his 162 game averages are close if not better than Co-Jack's in many key categories. The only things Co-Jack really has on him right now is power numbers and walks, which with time and at-bats, Parra can get better at.