- Thread starter
- #1
daveyou
New member
even though i am a knick fan, i am a huge derrick rose fan. he has def. improved on his scoring at almost 4 points + from last year. However, not until recently, his assists per game stands a bit lower than his rookie year at 6 per game.
i thought going into this season, his assists would be much improved but i can understand that he doesn't have a pure scorer on his team with luol deng? being the closest and of course, no more ben gordon
now, although i do not see any warriors or thunder games, i always look up these two player's stats. stephen curry and russell westbrook
stephen curry's stats are ridiculous, especially the last 2+ weeks....and for a rookie? all i can say is wow!!
russell westbrook....yes, he has durant. that alone is like 5 assists per night for westbrook. lol! however, his scoring has improved as well
so with that said, i still believe rose is a better overall player (maybe because i am a fan!) but curry and westbrook.....purely by their stats, do you think they are the better overall player or are their stats that much better because of their surroundings? warriors being all scoring and no defense while thunder has durant!
if rose played for thunder or warriors, would his hobby love still be as strong as it is now?
would curry's or westbrook's hobby love be stronger while they put up worse numbers then they do now BUT play for the bulls?
dave
i thought going into this season, his assists would be much improved but i can understand that he doesn't have a pure scorer on his team with luol deng? being the closest and of course, no more ben gordon
now, although i do not see any warriors or thunder games, i always look up these two player's stats. stephen curry and russell westbrook
stephen curry's stats are ridiculous, especially the last 2+ weeks....and for a rookie? all i can say is wow!!
russell westbrook....yes, he has durant. that alone is like 5 assists per night for westbrook. lol! however, his scoring has improved as well
so with that said, i still believe rose is a better overall player (maybe because i am a fan!) but curry and westbrook.....purely by their stats, do you think they are the better overall player or are their stats that much better because of their surroundings? warriors being all scoring and no defense while thunder has durant!
if rose played for thunder or warriors, would his hobby love still be as strong as it is now?
would curry's or westbrook's hobby love be stronger while they put up worse numbers then they do now BUT play for the bulls?
dave