don't quite understand how this card was made.....

[J.O.]

so did the original card have no back? did they put this "COA" as a sticker over the original? I figured maybe it was an extra coa but the seller states the authenticity is on the back of the card.

http://cgi.ebay.com/DEREK-JETER-2001-Fl ... 0276779610

 

[J.O.]

i don't see it being a reprint as the back says it's a 1993 fleer rookie card, not a reprint

 

[smapdi]

It's a 2001 card. There was no 1993 Fleer Jeter card. It's not a buy-back or anything like that. It was printed, signed and packed out in 2001. The only thing is that it has the 1993 Fleer design and they actually lie and say it's a 1993 Jeter.

 

[J.O.]

It's a 2001 card. There was no 1993 Fleer Jeter card. It's not a buy-back or anything like that. It was printed, signed and packed out in 2001. The only thing is that it has the 1993 Fleer design and they actually lie and say it's a 1993 Jeter.

well, that's great business practice.

 

[yankees23657]

if you notice, the area where the autograph is signed is somewhat whited out so that the auto sticks out better.

 

[wideright]

Wierd, but pretty nice looking card.

 

[J.O.]

Wierd, but pretty nice looking card.

it's nice looking but indeed a weird thing to do. (good idea, but should say "on a 1993 design) not a rookie)