eBay "tool" shed

[f2tornado]

I'm just laughing this one off. I get my first derogatory feedback left as a seller in years this morning due to a buyer (billydkid24) not knowing what a refractor looks like (if this is at all possible). The buyer claims my card was not a refractor despite that really shiny rainbow glow on my card that is standard on all refractor cards. Aside from me misspelling refractor in the title the buyer got exactly what was ordered. I offered the buyer a full refund and was strangely turned down. The buyer opted to keep the card despite his complaint then proceeded to leave neutral feedback. ????

Ken Griffey Jr. 1997 Topps Mystery Finest Refarctor #10 (#220584710499)

This is the card in question. It looks like a refractor, shines like a refractor, refracts light like a refractor... it is a fooking refractor.

 

[RiceLynnEvans75]

My only guess would be if the card says refractor on the back or not. (Or had an "R" next to the number) I don't remember when they actually started putting that on the back of those but if this guy has no idea that there was a time when they didn't do that, this may be a reason why he's saying it's not a refractor. Granted, the crazy shiny rainbow effect should be a sign that it IS one but who knows, maybe he's color blind.

 

[docdw25]

Is the year right on that or is it from 1998? 1998 Topps cards were hit and miss on labeling the refractor cards. Buyer might not understand that even if it's not labeled it's still a refractor.